Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

117D Best interests test

(1) The provider of a pension scheme to which this Part applies may effect a unilateral change under section 117B(1) only if— (a) the provider concludes, before doing so, that the best interests test is met in relation to the unilateral change, and (b) it is reasonable for the provider to have reached that conclusion at that time. (2) “The best interests test”, in relation to a unilateral change, is that it is reasonably likely that effecting it will achieve— (a) a better outcome for the directly affected members of the scheme (taken as a whole), and (b) no worse an outcome for the other members of the scheme (taken as a whole), than the relevant alternative action or, where there is more than one alternative action, each of them. (3) For the purposes of this Part, the members of a pension scheme who are “directly affected” by a unilateral change are the members for whom the scheme holds pension pots of the description in question. (4) The following are “relevant alternative actions” for the purposes of subsection (2) in relation to a unilateral change— (a) not effecting the unilateral change, and (b) where the unilateral change is an internal change, each other internal change that could be made in accordance with this Part in relation to pension pots of the description in question. (5) In subsection (4) “internal change” means a unilateral change that results in a description of pension pot held by the scheme being held— (a) subject to a different arrangement under the same scheme, or (b) subject to a particular arrangement under a different pension scheme operated by the same provider (including where there is only one arrangement under that scheme). (6) The FCA must make general rules specifying considerations or information that must be taken into account in determining whether the best interests test is met.

Your change, as a redline

117D Best interests test

(1) The provider of a pension scheme to which this Part applies may effect a unilateral change under section 117B(1) only if— (a) the provider concludes, before doing so, that the best interests test is met in relation to the unilateral change, and (b) it is reasonable for the provider to have reached that conclusion at that time. (2) “The best interests test”, in relation to a unilateral change, is that it is reasonably likely that effecting it will achieve— (a) a better outcome for the directly affected members of the scheme (taken as a whole), and (b) no worse an outcome for the other members of the scheme (taken as a whole), than the relevant alternative action or, where there is more than one alternative action, each of them. (3) For the purposes of this Part, the members of a pension scheme who are “directly affected” by a unilateral change are the members for whom the scheme holds pension pots of the description in question. (4) The following are “relevant alternative actions” for the purposes of subsection (2) in relation to a unilateral change— (a) not effecting the unilateral change, and (b) where the unilateral change is an internal change, each other internal change that could be made in accordance with this Part in relation to pension pots of the description in question. (5) In subsection (4) “internal change” means a unilateral change that results in a description of pension pot held by the scheme being held— (a) subject to a different arrangement under the same scheme, or (b) subject to a particular arrangement under a different pension scheme operated by the same provider (including where there is only one arrangement under that scheme). (6) The FCA must make general rules specifying considerations or information that must be taken into account in determining whether the best interests test is met.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds