Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

186 Assessment criteria

The matters specified in section 185(3)(a) are— (a) the reputation of the section 178 notice-giver; (b) the reputation , knowledge, skills and experience of any person who will direct the business of the UK authorised person as a result of the proposed acquisition; (c) the financial soundness of the section 178 notice-giver, in particular in relation to the type of business that the UK authorised person pursues or envisages pursuing; (d) whether the UK authorised person will be able to comply with its prudential requirements (including the threshold conditions in relation to all of the regulated activities for which it has or will have permission); (e) if the UK authorised person is to become part of a group as a result of the acquisition, whether that group has a structure which makes it possible to— (i) exercise effective supervision; (ii) exchange information among regulators; and (iii) determine the allocation of responsibility among regulators; and (f) whether there are reasonable grounds to suspect that in connection with the proposed acquisition— (i) money laundering or terrorist financing (as defined in regulation 3(1) of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017) is being or has been committed or attempted; or (ii) the risk of such activity could increase.

Your change, as a redline

186 Assessment criteria

The matters specified in section 185(3)(a) are— (a) the reputation of the section 178 notice-giver; (b) the reputation , knowledge, skills and experience of any person who will direct the business of the UK authorised person as a result of the proposed acquisition; (c) the financial soundness of the section 178 notice-giver, in particular in relation to the type of business that the UK authorised person pursues or envisages pursuing; (d) whether the UK authorised person will be able to comply with its prudential requirements (including the threshold conditions in relation to all of the regulated activities for which it has or will have permission); (e) if the UK authorised person is to become part of a group as a result of the acquisition, whether that group has a structure which makes it possible to— (i) exercise effective supervision; (ii) exchange information among regulators; and (iii) determine the allocation of responsibility among regulators; and (f) whether there are reasonable grounds to suspect that in connection with the proposed acquisition— (i) money laundering or terrorist financing (as defined in regulation 3(1) of the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017) is being or has been committed or attempted; or (ii) the risk of such activity could increase.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds