Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

191A Objection by the appropriate regulator

(1) The appropriate regulator may object to a person's control over a UK authorised person in any of the circumstances specified in subsection (2). (2) The circumstances are that the appropriate regulator reasonably believes that— (a) the person acquired or increased control without giving notice under section 178(1) in circumstances where notice was required; (b) the person is in breach of a condition imposed under section 187; or (c) there are grounds for objecting to control on the basis of the matters in section 186. (3) The appropriate regulator— (a) must take into account whether influence exercised by the person is likely to operate to the detriment of the sound and prudent management of the UK authorised person; and (b) may take into account whether the person has co-operated with any information requests made or requirements imposed by the appropriate regulator. (4) If the appropriate regulator proposes to object to a person's control over a UK authorised person, it must give that person a warning notice. (4A) Where the appropriate regulator is the PRA, it must consult the FCA before giving a warning notice under this section. (4B) Where the appropriate regulator is the FCA, it must consult the PRA before giving a warning notice under this section if— (a) the UK authorised person has as a member of its immediate group a PRA-authorised person, or (b) the person to whom the warning notice is to be given is a PRA-authorised person. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) If the appropriate regulator decides to object to a person's control over a UK authorised person, it must give that person a decision notice. (7) A person to whom the appropriate regulator gives a decision notice under this section may refer the matter to the Tribunal.

Your change, as a redline

191A Objection by the appropriate regulator

(1) The appropriate regulator may object to a person's control over a UK authorised person in any of the circumstances specified in subsection (2). (2) The circumstances are that the appropriate regulator reasonably believes that— (a) the person acquired or increased control without giving notice under section 178(1) in circumstances where notice was required; (b) the person is in breach of a condition imposed under section 187; or (c) there are grounds for objecting to control on the basis of the matters in section 186. (3) The appropriate regulator— (a) must take into account whether influence exercised by the person is likely to operate to the detriment of the sound and prudent management of the UK authorised person; and (b) may take into account whether the person has co-operated with any information requests made or requirements imposed by the appropriate regulator. (4) If the appropriate regulator proposes to object to a person's control over a UK authorised person, it must give that person a warning notice. (4A) Where the appropriate regulator is the PRA, it must consult the FCA before giving a warning notice under this section. (4B) Where the appropriate regulator is the FCA, it must consult the PRA before giving a warning notice under this section if— (a) the UK authorised person has as a member of its immediate group a PRA-authorised person, or (b) the person to whom the warning notice is to be given is a PRA-authorised person. (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) If the appropriate regulator decides to object to a person's control over a UK authorised person, it must give that person a decision notice. (7) A person to whom the appropriate regulator gives a decision notice under this section may refer the matter to the Tribunal.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds