Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

214C Limit on amount of special resolution regime payments

(1) The total amount of special resolution regime payments required to be made in respect of a person (“the institution”) may not exceed— (a) notional net expenditure (see subsection (3)), minus (b) actual net expenditure (see subsection (4)). (2) A “special resolution regime payment” is— (a) a payment under section 214B(2); or (b) a payment required to be made by the scheme manager by virtue of section 61 of the Banking Act 2009 (special resolution regime: compensation). (3) Notional net expenditure is— (a) the total amount of expenses that would have been incurred under the compensation scheme in respect of the institution if the stabilisation power had not been exercised and the institution had been unable to satisfy claims against it, minus (b) the total amount that would have been likely, at the time when the power was exercised, to be recovered by the scheme manager in respect of the institution in those circumstances. (4) Actual net expenditure is— (a) the total amount of expenses (other than special resolution regime payments) actually incurred by the scheme manager in respect of the institution, minus (b) the total amount actually recovered by the scheme manager in respect of the institution. (5) In subsection (3)(a) “expenses” includes interest at a specified rate on the difference, at any time, between— (a) the total amount of expenses (including interest) that would have been incurred as mentioned in subsection (3)(a) at or before that time; and (b) the total amount that would have been likely to have been recovered as mentioned in subsection (3)(b) at or before that time. (6) In subsection (4)(a) “expenses” includes interest at a specified rate on the difference, at any time, between— (a) the total amount of expenses (including special resolution regime payments and interest) actually incurred by the scheme manager in respect of the institution at or before that time; and (b) the total amount actually recovered by the scheme manager in respect of the institution at or before that time. (7) In paragraph (b) of subsections (3) to (6) references to amounts recovered (or likely to have been recovered) by the scheme manager do not include any levy received (or likely to have been received) by it.

Your change, as a redline

214C Limit on amount of special resolution regime payments

(1) The total amount of special resolution regime payments required to be made in respect of a person (“the institution”) may not exceed— (a) notional net expenditure (see subsection (3)), minus (b) actual net expenditure (see subsection (4)). (2) A “special resolution regime payment” is— (a) a payment under section 214B(2); or (b) a payment required to be made by the scheme manager by virtue of section 61 of the Banking Act 2009 (special resolution regime: compensation). (3) Notional net expenditure is— (a) the total amount of expenses that would have been incurred under the compensation scheme in respect of the institution if the stabilisation power had not been exercised and the institution had been unable to satisfy claims against it, minus (b) the total amount that would have been likely, at the time when the power was exercised, to be recovered by the scheme manager in respect of the institution in those circumstances. (4) Actual net expenditure is— (a) the total amount of expenses (other than special resolution regime payments) actually incurred by the scheme manager in respect of the institution, minus (b) the total amount actually recovered by the scheme manager in respect of the institution. (5) In subsection (3)(a) “expenses” includes interest at a specified rate on the difference, at any time, between— (a) the total amount of expenses (including interest) that would have been incurred as mentioned in subsection (3)(a) at or before that time; and (b) the total amount that would have been likely to have been recovered as mentioned in subsection (3)(b) at or before that time. (6) In subsection (4)(a) “expenses” includes interest at a specified rate on the difference, at any time, between— (a) the total amount of expenses (including special resolution regime payments and interest) actually incurred by the scheme manager in respect of the institution at or before that time; and (b) the total amount actually recovered by the scheme manager in respect of the institution at or before that time. (7) In paragraph (b) of subsections (3) to (6) references to amounts recovered (or likely to have been recovered) by the scheme manager do not include any levy received (or likely to have been received) by it.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds