Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

290A Refusal of recognition on ground of excessive regulatory provision

(1) The appropriate regulator must not make a recognition order if it appears to it that an existing or proposed regulatory provision of the applicant in connection with— (a) the applicant's business as an investment exchange, ... (b) the provision by the applicant of clearing services, or (c) the provision by the applicant of services falling within section 285(2)(b) or (3)(b), imposes or will impose an excessive requirement on the persons affected (directly or indirectly) by it. (2) The reference in section 290(1) (making of recognition order) to satisfying the applicable recognition requirements shall be read accordingly. (3) Expressions used in subsection (1) above that are defined for the purposes of section 300A (power of appropriate regulator to disallow excessive regulatory provision) have the same meaning as in that section. (4) The provisions of section 300A(3) and (4) (determination whether regulatory provision excessive) apply for the purposes of this section as for the purposes of section 300A. (5) Section 298 has effect in relation to a decision under this section to refuse a recognition order— (a) as it has effect in relation to a decision to revoke such an order, and (b) as if references to a recognised body were references to the applicant. (6) This section does not apply to an application for recognition as an overseas investment exchange, an overseas clearing house , a recognised central counterparty or a recognised CSD.

Your change, as a redline

290A Refusal of recognition on ground of excessive regulatory provision

(1) The appropriate regulator must not make a recognition order if it appears to it that an existing or proposed regulatory provision of the applicant in connection with— (a) the applicant's business as an investment exchange, ... (b) the provision by the applicant of clearing services, or (c) the provision by the applicant of services falling within section 285(2)(b) or (3)(b), imposes or will impose an excessive requirement on the persons affected (directly or indirectly) by it. (2) The reference in section 290(1) (making of recognition order) to satisfying the applicable recognition requirements shall be read accordingly. (3) Expressions used in subsection (1) above that are defined for the purposes of section 300A (power of appropriate regulator to disallow excessive regulatory provision) have the same meaning as in that section. (4) The provisions of section 300A(3) and (4) (determination whether regulatory provision excessive) apply for the purposes of this section as for the purposes of section 300A. (5) Section 298 has effect in relation to a decision under this section to refuse a recognition order— (a) as it has effect in relation to a decision to revoke such an order, and (b) as if references to a recognised body were references to the applicant. (6) This section does not apply to an application for recognition as an overseas investment exchange, an overseas clearing house , a recognised central counterparty or a recognised CSD.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds