Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

309Z1 Rules of conduct

(1) If it appears to the appropriate regulator to be necessary or expedient for the purposes of advancing a relevant objective, the appropriate regulator may make rules about the conduct of the following persons in relation to the performance by them of qualifying functions— (a) persons in relation to whom the appropriate regulator has given its approval under section 309G (“Part 18 approved persons”); (b) directors of relevant recognised bodies; (c) employees of relevant recognised bodies. (2) Rules under subsection (1) may include provision requiring a relevant recognised body to— (a) notify persons mentioned in subsection (1) of the rules that apply to them; (b) take specified steps to secure that such persons understand how those rules apply in relation to them. (3) Rules under subsection (1) may include provision requiring a relevant recognised body to notify the appropriate regulator if the body takes specified disciplinary action in relation to a person mentioned in subsection (1). (4) In this section— “qualifying function” means a function relating to the carrying on of activities by the following— in the case of a Part 18 approved person, the relevant recognised body on whose application approval was given; in the case of a director or employee of a relevant recognised body, who is not a Part 18 approved person, the relevant recognised body; “relevant objective” means— if the appropriate regulator is the FCA, any of its operational objectives; if the appropriate regulator is the Bank of England, the Financial Stability Objective. “specified” means specified in the rules.

Your change, as a redline

309Z1 Rules of conduct

(1) If it appears to the appropriate regulator to be necessary or expedient for the purposes of advancing a relevant objective, the appropriate regulator may make rules about the conduct of the following persons in relation to the performance by them of qualifying functions— (a) persons in relation to whom the appropriate regulator has given its approval under section 309G (“Part 18 approved persons”); (b) directors of relevant recognised bodies; (c) employees of relevant recognised bodies. (2) Rules under subsection (1) may include provision requiring a relevant recognised body to— (a) notify persons mentioned in subsection (1) of the rules that apply to them; (b) take specified steps to secure that such persons understand how those rules apply in relation to them. (3) Rules under subsection (1) may include provision requiring a relevant recognised body to notify the appropriate regulator if the body takes specified disciplinary action in relation to a person mentioned in subsection (1). (4) In this section— “qualifying function” means a function relating to the carrying on of activities by the following— in the case of a Part 18 approved person, the relevant recognised body on whose application approval was given; in the case of a director or employee of a relevant recognised body, who is not a Part 18 approved person, the relevant recognised body; “relevant objective” means— if the appropriate regulator is the FCA, any of its operational objectives; if the appropriate regulator is the Bank of England, the Financial Stability Objective. “specified” means specified in the rules.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds