Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

309Z3 Meaning of “misconduct”

(1) For the purposes of section 309Z2, a person is guilty of misconduct if any of conditions A to C is met. (2) Condition A is that— (a) the person has at any time failed to comply with rules made under section 309Z1, and (b) at that time the person was— (i) a Part 18 approved person, (ii) an employee of a relevant recognised body, or (iii) a director of a relevant recognised body. (3) Condition B is that— (a) the person has at any time after the passing of this Act been knowingly concerned in a contravention by a relevant recognised body of a relevant requirement, and (b) at that time the person was— (i) a Part 18 approved person in relation to the relevant recognised body, (ii) an employee of the relevant recognised body, or (iii) a director of the relevant recognised body. (4) Condition C is that— (a) the person has at any time been a Part 18 approved person in relation to a relevant recognised body, (b) at that time there was, or continued to be, a contravention by the body of a relevant requirement, (c) the person was at that time responsible for the management of any of the body’s activities in relation to which the contravention occurred, and (d) the person did not take such steps as a person in that position could reasonably be expected to take to avoid the contravention occurring or continuing. (5) In this section— “Part 18 approved person”— means a person in relation to whom an approval is given under section 309G, and in relation to a relevant recognised body, means a person in relation to whom such approval is given on the application of the relevant recognised body; “relevant requirement” has the meaning given by section 312E(2) and (3).

Your change, as a redline

309Z3 Meaning of “misconduct”

(1) For the purposes of section 309Z2, a person is guilty of misconduct if any of conditions A to C is met. (2) Condition A is that— (a) the person has at any time failed to comply with rules made under section 309Z1, and (b) at that time the person was— (i) a Part 18 approved person, (ii) an employee of a relevant recognised body, or (iii) a director of a relevant recognised body. (3) Condition B is that— (a) the person has at any time after the passing of this Act been knowingly concerned in a contravention by a relevant recognised body of a relevant requirement, and (b) at that time the person was— (i) a Part 18 approved person in relation to the relevant recognised body, (ii) an employee of the relevant recognised body, or (iii) a director of the relevant recognised body. (4) Condition C is that— (a) the person has at any time been a Part 18 approved person in relation to a relevant recognised body, (b) at that time there was, or continued to be, a contravention by the body of a relevant requirement, (c) the person was at that time responsible for the management of any of the body’s activities in relation to which the contravention occurred, and (d) the person did not take such steps as a person in that position could reasonably be expected to take to avoid the contravention occurring or continuing. (5) In this section— “Part 18 approved person”— means a person in relation to whom an approval is given under section 309G, and in relation to a relevant recognised body, means a person in relation to whom such approval is given on the application of the relevant recognised body; “relevant requirement” has the meaning given by section 312E(2) and (3).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds