Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

312N Power of direction

(1) A relevant regulator may, if it appears to the regulator to be necessary or expedient for the purpose of advancing any of its objectives, direct a critical third party to— (a) do anything specified in the direction, or (b) refrain from doing anything specified in the direction. (2) A direction under this section— (a) must be given by notice in writing, (b) may be expressed to have effect during a specified period or until revoked, and (c) may specify the way in which, and the time by which, a thing is to be done. (3) Subsection (4) applies if a direction is given to a critical third party for the purpose of resolving or reducing a threat to the stability or integrity of the UK financial system. (4) The critical third party (including the critical third party’s officers and staff) has immunity from liability in damages in respect of action or inaction in accordance with the direction. (5) A direction given for the purpose mentioned in subsection (3) must— (a) include a statement that it is given for that purpose, and (b) inform the critical third party of the effect of subsection (4). (6) An immunity conferred by this section does not extend to action or inaction— (a) in bad faith, or (b) in contravention of section 6(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998. (7) A relevant regulator may at any time revoke a direction under this section by giving notice in writing to the critical third party to which the direction relates. (8) The revocation of the direction does not affect the validity of anything previously done in accordance with it. (9) For the purposes of this section the objectives of a relevant regulator are as described in section 312M(2).

Your change, as a redline

312N Power of direction

(1) A relevant regulator may, if it appears to the regulator to be necessary or expedient for the purpose of advancing any of its objectives, direct a critical third party to— (a) do anything specified in the direction, or (b) refrain from doing anything specified in the direction. (2) A direction under this section— (a) must be given by notice in writing, (b) may be expressed to have effect during a specified period or until revoked, and (c) may specify the way in which, and the time by which, a thing is to be done. (3) Subsection (4) applies if a direction is given to a critical third party for the purpose of resolving or reducing a threat to the stability or integrity of the UK financial system. (4) The critical third party (including the critical third party’s officers and staff) has immunity from liability in damages in respect of action or inaction in accordance with the direction. (5) A direction given for the purpose mentioned in subsection (3) must— (a) include a statement that it is given for that purpose, and (b) inform the critical third party of the effect of subsection (4). (6) An immunity conferred by this section does not extend to action or inaction— (a) in bad faith, or (b) in contravention of section 6(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998. (7) A relevant regulator may at any time revoke a direction under this section by giving notice in writing to the critical third party to which the direction relates. (8) The revocation of the direction does not affect the validity of anything previously done in accordance with it. (9) For the purposes of this section the objectives of a relevant regulator are as described in section 312M(2).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds