Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

345A Disciplinary measures: PRA

(1) The following provisions of this section have effect only if the Treasury, by order made after consultation with the PRA, so provide. (2) Subsection (3) applies if it appears to the PRA that an auditor or actuary to whom section 342 applies— (a) has failed to comply with a duty imposed on the auditor or actuary by rules made by the PRA, or (b) has failed to comply with a duty imposed under this Act to communicate information to the PRA. (3) The PRA may exercise one or more of the specified powers. (4) The specified powers are such one or more of the following as may be specified in the order under subsection (1)— (a) to disqualify the auditor or actuary from being the auditor of, or (as the case may be) from acting as an actuary for, any PRA-authorised person or any particular class of PRA-authorised person; (b) to publish a statement to the effect that it appears to the PRA that the auditor or (as the case may be) actuary has failed to comply with the duty; (c) to impose on the auditor or actuary a penalty, payable to the PRA, of such amount as the PRA considers appropriate. (5) Where the PRA disqualifies a person under subsection (4)(a) it must— (a) notify the FCA, and (b) notify the person concerned that it has made a notification under paragraph (a). (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) The PRA may remove any disqualification imposed under subsection (4)(a) if satisfied that the disqualified person will in future comply with the duty in question.

Your change, as a redline

345A Disciplinary measures: PRA

(1) The following provisions of this section have effect only if the Treasury, by order made after consultation with the PRA, so provide. (2) Subsection (3) applies if it appears to the PRA that an auditor or actuary to whom section 342 applies— (a) has failed to comply with a duty imposed on the auditor or actuary by rules made by the PRA, or (b) has failed to comply with a duty imposed under this Act to communicate information to the PRA. (3) The PRA may exercise one or more of the specified powers. (4) The specified powers are such one or more of the following as may be specified in the order under subsection (1)— (a) to disqualify the auditor or actuary from being the auditor of, or (as the case may be) from acting as an actuary for, any PRA-authorised person or any particular class of PRA-authorised person; (b) to publish a statement to the effect that it appears to the PRA that the auditor or (as the case may be) actuary has failed to comply with the duty; (c) to impose on the auditor or actuary a penalty, payable to the PRA, of such amount as the PRA considers appropriate. (5) Where the PRA disqualifies a person under subsection (4)(a) it must— (a) notify the FCA, and (b) notify the person concerned that it has made a notification under paragraph (a). (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (7) The PRA may remove any disqualification imposed under subsection (4)(a) if satisfied that the disqualified person will in future comply with the duty in question.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds