Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

372 Petitions.

(1) The FCA may present a petition to the court— (a) under section 264 of the 1986 Act (or Article 238 of the 1989 Order) for a bankruptcy order to be made against an individual; or (b) under section 2 or 5 of the 2016 Act for the sequestration of the estate of an individual. (1A) The PRA may present a petition to the court— (a) under section 264 of the 1986 Act (or Article 238 of the 1989 Order) for a bankruptcy order to be made against an individual who is a PRA-regulated person; (b) under section 2 or 5 of the 2016 Act for the sequestration of the estate of an individual who is a PRA-regulated person. (2) But a petition may be presented by virtue of subsection (1) or (1A) only on the ground that— (a) the individual appears to be unable to pay a regulated activity debt; or (b) the individual appears to have no reasonable prospect of being able to pay a regulated activity debt. (3) An individual appears to be unable to pay a regulated activity debt if he is in default on an obligation to pay a sum due and payable under an agreement. (4) An individual appears to have no reasonable prospect of being able to pay a regulated activity debt if— (a) a regulator has served on him a demand requiring him to establish to the satisfaction of that regulator that there is a reasonable prospect that he will be able to pay a sum payable under an agreement when it falls due; (b) at least three weeks have elapsed since the demand was served; and (c) the demand has been neither complied with nor set aside in accordance with rules. (5) A demand made under subsection (4)(a) is to be treated for the purposes of the 1986 Act (or the 1989 Order) as if it were a statutory demand under section 268 of that Act (or Article 242 of that Order). (6) For the purposes of a petition presented in accordance with subsection (1)(b) or (1A)(b)— (a) the regulator by which the petition is presented is to be treated as a qualified creditor; and (b) a ground mentioned in subsection (2) constitutes apparent insolvency. (7) “Individual” means an individual— (a) who is, or has been, an authorised person; or (b) who is carrying on, or has carried on, a regulated activity in contravention of the general prohibition. (8) “Agreement” means an agreement the making or performance of which constitutes or is part of a regulated activity carried on by the individual concerned. (9) “Rules” means— (a) in England and Wales, rules made under section 412 of the 1986 Act; (b) in Scotland, rules made by order by the Treasury, after consultation with the Scottish Ministers, for the purposes of this section; and (c) in Northern Ireland, rules made under Article 359 of the 1989 Order.

Your change, as a redline

372 Petitions.

(1) The FCA may present a petition to the court— (a) under section 264 of the 1986 Act (or Article 238 of the 1989 Order) for a bankruptcy order to be made against an individual; or (b) under section 2 or 5 of the 2016 Act for the sequestration of the estate of an individual. (1A) The PRA may present a petition to the court— (a) under section 264 of the 1986 Act (or Article 238 of the 1989 Order) for a bankruptcy order to be made against an individual who is a PRA-regulated person; (b) under section 2 or 5 of the 2016 Act for the sequestration of the estate of an individual who is a PRA-regulated person. (2) But a petition may be presented by virtue of subsection (1) or (1A) only on the ground that— (a) the individual appears to be unable to pay a regulated activity debt; or (b) the individual appears to have no reasonable prospect of being able to pay a regulated activity debt. (3) An individual appears to be unable to pay a regulated activity debt if he is in default on an obligation to pay a sum due and payable under an agreement. (4) An individual appears to have no reasonable prospect of being able to pay a regulated activity debt if— (a) a regulator has served on him a demand requiring him to establish to the satisfaction of that regulator that there is a reasonable prospect that he will be able to pay a sum payable under an agreement when it falls due; (b) at least three weeks have elapsed since the demand was served; and (c) the demand has been neither complied with nor set aside in accordance with rules. (5) A demand made under subsection (4)(a) is to be treated for the purposes of the 1986 Act (or the 1989 Order) as if it were a statutory demand under section 268 of that Act (or Article 242 of that Order). (6) For the purposes of a petition presented in accordance with subsection (1)(b) or (1A)(b)— (a) the regulator by which the petition is presented is to be treated as a qualified creditor; and (b) a ground mentioned in subsection (2) constitutes apparent insolvency. (7) “Individual” means an individual— (a) who is, or has been, an authorised person; or (b) who is carrying on, or has carried on, a regulated activity in contravention of the general prohibition. (8) “Agreement” means an agreement the making or performance of which constitutes or is part of a regulated activity carried on by the individual concerned. (9) “Rules” means— (a) in England and Wales, rules made under section 412 of the 1986 Act; (b) in Scotland, rules made by order by the Treasury, after consultation with the Scottish Ministers, for the purposes of this section; and (c) in Northern Ireland, rules made under Article 359 of the 1989 Order.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds