Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

71D Sections 71B and 71C: conditions

(1) The condition in this subsection is met in relation to a relevant firm or a parent undertaking if— (a) there is a deterioration in the financial situation of the relevant firm or the parent undertaking which is a significant deterioration, or (b) there is a serious infringement by the relevant firm or the parent undertaking of— (i) a relevant requirement, or (ii) its memorandum or articles of association or other constituent instrument. (2) The condition in this subsection is met in relation to a relevant firm if it is not reasonably likely that the deterioration would be reversed or the infringement would be brought to an end by any measure defined as a “relevant measure” by article 107 of the Bank Recovery and Resolution (No. 2) Order 2014 (S.I. 2014/3348) which could be taken by the appropriate regulator under the provisions listed in subsection (3). (3) The provisions mentioned in subsection (2) are— (a) section 55J (variation or cancellation on initiative of regulator), (b) section 55L (imposition of requirements by FCA), (c) section 55M (imposition of requirements by PRA), (d) section 55PB (requirements relating to general meetings), (e) section 56 (prohibition orders), (f) section 63 (withdrawal of approval), (g) section 63ZA (variation of senior manager’s approval at request of authorised person), (h) section 63ZB (variation of senior manager’s approval on initiative of regulator), (i) section 63A (power to impose penalties), (j) section 66 (disciplinary powers), (k) Part 12A (powers exercisable in relation to parent undertakings), or (l) Part 14 (disciplinary measures). (4) The condition in this subsection is met if the following action would not be sufficient to reverse the deterioration or bring the infringement to an end— (a) in the case of a relevant firm, the imposition of one or more requirements under section 71B (removal and replacement of directors and senior executives); or (b) in the case of a parent undertaking which is not a relevant firm, the exercise of any of the appropriate regulator’s powers under Part 12A. (4A) The condition in this subsection is met in relation to a director of an institution, of a financial holding company or of a mixed financial holding company, if the director— (a) is no longer of sufficiently good repute to perform their duties, (b) no longer possesses sufficient knowledge, skills, experience, honesty, integrity or independence of mind to perform their duties, or (c) is no longer able to commit sufficient time to perform their duties. (5) For the purposes of this section— (a) “relevant requirement” has the meaning given in section 204A; (b) a deterioration in the financial situation of the relevant firm or the parent undertaking is significant if— (i) in the case of a relevant firm, or a parent undertaking which is an authorised person, it no longer satisfies, or is likely to fail to satisfy, the threshold conditions relating to its financial resources which apply to it under Schedule 6; (ii) in the case of a parent undertaking which is not an authorised person, the deterioration threatens the viability of the parent undertaking.

Your change, as a redline

71D Sections 71B and 71C: conditions

(1) The condition in this subsection is met in relation to a relevant firm or a parent undertaking if— (a) there is a deterioration in the financial situation of the relevant firm or the parent undertaking which is a significant deterioration, or (b) there is a serious infringement by the relevant firm or the parent undertaking of— (i) a relevant requirement, or (ii) its memorandum or articles of association or other constituent instrument. (2) The condition in this subsection is met in relation to a relevant firm if it is not reasonably likely that the deterioration would be reversed or the infringement would be brought to an end by any measure defined as a “relevant measure” by article 107 of the Bank Recovery and Resolution (No. 2) Order 2014 (S.I. 2014/3348) which could be taken by the appropriate regulator under the provisions listed in subsection (3). (3) The provisions mentioned in subsection (2) are— (a) section 55J (variation or cancellation on initiative of regulator), (b) section 55L (imposition of requirements by FCA), (c) section 55M (imposition of requirements by PRA), (d) section 55PB (requirements relating to general meetings), (e) section 56 (prohibition orders), (f) section 63 (withdrawal of approval), (g) section 63ZA (variation of senior manager’s approval at request of authorised person), (h) section 63ZB (variation of senior manager’s approval on initiative of regulator), (i) section 63A (power to impose penalties), (j) section 66 (disciplinary powers), (k) Part 12A (powers exercisable in relation to parent undertakings), or (l) Part 14 (disciplinary measures). (4) The condition in this subsection is met if the following action would not be sufficient to reverse the deterioration or bring the infringement to an end— (a) in the case of a relevant firm, the imposition of one or more requirements under section 71B (removal and replacement of directors and senior executives); or (b) in the case of a parent undertaking which is not a relevant firm, the exercise of any of the appropriate regulator’s powers under Part 12A. (4A) The condition in this subsection is met in relation to a director of an institution, of a financial holding company or of a mixed financial holding company, if the director— (a) is no longer of sufficiently good repute to perform their duties, (b) no longer possesses sufficient knowledge, skills, experience, honesty, integrity or independence of mind to perform their duties, or (c) is no longer able to commit sufficient time to perform their duties. (5) For the purposes of this section— (a) “relevant requirement” has the meaning given in section 204A; (b) a deterioration in the financial situation of the relevant firm or the parent undertaking is significant if— (i) in the case of a relevant firm, or a parent undertaking which is an authorised person, it no longer satisfies, or is likely to fail to satisfy, the threshold conditions relating to its financial resources which apply to it under Schedule 6; (ii) in the case of a parent undertaking which is not an authorised person, the deterioration threatens the viability of the parent undertaking.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds