Propose a change

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

89F Transparency rules: interpretation etc

(1) For the purposes of sections 89A to 89G— (a) the voting rights in respect of any voting shares are the voting rights attached to those shares, and (b) a person is to be regarded as holding the voting rights in respect of the shares— (i) if, by virtue of those shares, he is a shareholder within the meaning of Article 2.1(e) of the transparency obligations directive; (ii) if, and to the extent that, he is entitled to acquire, dispose of or exercise those voting rights in one or more of the cases mentioned in Article 10(a) to (h) of the transparency obligations directive; (iii) if he holds, directly or indirectly, a financial instrument which satisfies the conditions set out in Article 13(1)(a) or (b) of the transparency obligations directive... (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1A) The FCA must establish, publish and periodically update an indicative list of financial instruments that are subject to notification requirements by virtue of subsection (1)(b)(iii), taking into account developments on financial markets. (1B) Publication of the indicative list is to be in such manner as the FCA considers appropriate. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) For the purposes of sections 89A to 89G two or more persons may, at the same time, each be regarded as holding the same voting rights. (4) In those sections— ... ... “UK market” means a market that is situated or operating in the United Kingdom; “voting shares” means shares of an issuer to which voting rights are attached.

Your change, as a redline

89F Transparency rules: interpretation etc

(1) For the purposes of sections 89A to 89G— (a) the voting rights in respect of any voting shares are the voting rights attached to those shares, and (b) a person is to be regarded as holding the voting rights in respect of the shares— (i) if, by virtue of those shares, he is a shareholder within the meaning of Article 2.1(e) of the transparency obligations directive; (ii) if, and to the extent that, he is entitled to acquire, dispose of or exercise those voting rights in one or more of the cases mentioned in Article 10(a) to (h) of the transparency obligations directive; (iii) if he holds, directly or indirectly, a financial instrument which satisfies the conditions set out in Article 13(1)(a) or (b) of the transparency obligations directive... (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1A) The FCA must establish, publish and periodically update an indicative list of financial instruments that are subject to notification requirements by virtue of subsection (1)(b)(iii), taking into account developments on financial markets. (1B) Publication of the indicative list is to be in such manner as the FCA considers appropriate. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) For the purposes of sections 89A to 89G two or more persons may, at the same time, each be regarded as holding the same voting rights. (4) In those sections— ... ... “UK market” means a market that is situated or operating in the United Kingdom; “voting shares” means shares of an issuer to which voting rights are attached.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds