The Building Safety (Responsible Actors Scheme and Prohibitions) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
8 Eligibility: buildings eligible for remediation funds
(1) The criteria in this regulation are satisfied if— (a) P has been responsible for the development or refurbishment of two or more buildings which have before the date these Regulations come into force been assessed as being eligible for funding under one of the following funds established by the Secretary of State— (i) the Private Sector ACM Cladding Remediation Fund; (ii) the Social Sector ACM Cladding Remediation Fund; or (iii) the Building Safety Fund; and (b) P satisfies the condition in regulation 11. (2) For the purposes of determining whether the condition in paragraph (1)(a) is met, P is to be treated as being responsible for the development or refurbishment of a building if a body corporate in the same group as P (“GP”) was responsible for developing or refurbishing the building, whether or not the building was developed or refurbished before GP was in the same group as P. (3) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(a), a building has been assessed as eligible if— (a) a decision has been taken by the Secretary of State— (i) in relation to the Private Sector ACM Cladding Remediation Fund, approving the grant of funding in relation to the building, with or without conditions, (ii) in relation to the Social Sector ACM Cladding Remediation Fund, approving the application for funding, with or without conditions, or (iii) in relation to the Building Safety Fund, determining that the building is eligible for funding from the Fund, and (b) notice in writing of the decision has been given to the person who made the application to the fund in question.
8 Eligibility: buildings eligible for remediation funds
(1) The criteria in this regulation are satisfied if— (a) P has been responsible for the development or refurbishment of two or more buildings which have before the date these Regulations come into force been assessed as being eligible for funding under one of the following funds established by the Secretary of State— (i) the Private Sector ACM Cladding Remediation Fund; (ii) the Social Sector ACM Cladding Remediation Fund; or (iii) the Building Safety Fund; and (b) P satisfies the condition in regulation 11. (2) For the purposes of determining whether the condition in paragraph (1)(a) is met, P is to be treated as being responsible for the development or refurbishment of a building if a body corporate in the same group as P (“GP”) was responsible for developing or refurbishing the building, whether or not the building was developed or refurbished before GP was in the same group as P. (3) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(a), a building has been assessed as eligible if— (a) a decision has been taken by the Secretary of State— (i) in relation to the Private Sector ACM Cladding Remediation Fund, approving the grant of funding in relation to the building, with or without conditions, (ii) in relation to the Social Sector ACM Cladding Remediation Fund, approving the application for funding, with or without conditions, or (iii) in relation to the Building Safety Fund, determining that the building is eligible for funding from the Fund, and (b) notice in writing of the decision has been given to the person who made the application to the fund in question.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.