Propose a change

The Trade Remedies (Increase in Imports Causing Serious Injury to UK Producers) (EU Exit) (Amendment) Regulations 2023

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

16 Amendment of regulation 39 (suspension of a definitive safeguarding remedy)

In regulation 39— (a) in paragraph (9), for “accept or reject it” substitute— — (a) accept or reject the recommendation; or (b) request that the TRA reassess its recommendation, by reference to any matters specified in the request, with a view to amending or replacing the recommendation ; (b) after paragraph (10), insert— (10A) Paragraph (10B) applies if the recommendation is rejected. (10B) If the Secretary of State considers that it is in the public interest to do so, the Secretary of State may decide to vary the recommended period of suspension, subject to regulation 41(1). (10C) Where the Secretary of State makes a decision under paragraph (10B), the Secretary of State must lay a statement before the House of Commons setting out the reasons for making the decision. ; (c) in paragraph (11), after “rejects a suspension recommendation”, insert “and does not make a decision under paragraph (10B)”; (d) after paragraph (12), insert— (13) The Secretary of State may only make a request under paragraph (9)(b) where the Secretary of State considers that— (a) there is information that the TRA did not take into account in its consideration of whether the circumstances in paragraph (4) exist that is relevant to that consideration; (b) the TRA made an error in relation to its recommendation; or (c) exceptional circumstances make the request appropriate. (14) Before making a request under paragraph (9)(b), the Secretary of State must consult the TRA. (15) Where the Secretary of State makes a request under paragraph (9)(b), the TRA must— (a) comply with the request; and (b) in reassessing its recommendation, have regard to any particular considerations which the Secretary of State may specify in the request. .

Your change, as a redline

16 Amendment of regulation 39 (suspension of a definitive safeguarding remedy)

In regulation 39— (a) in paragraph (9), for “accept or reject it” substitute— — (a) accept or reject the recommendation; or (b) request that the TRA reassess its recommendation, by reference to any matters specified in the request, with a view to amending or replacing the recommendation ; (b) after paragraph (10), insert— (10A) Paragraph (10B) applies if the recommendation is rejected. (10B) If the Secretary of State considers that it is in the public interest to do so, the Secretary of State may decide to vary the recommended period of suspension, subject to regulation 41(1). (10C) Where the Secretary of State makes a decision under paragraph (10B), the Secretary of State must lay a statement before the House of Commons setting out the reasons for making the decision. ; (c) in paragraph (11), after “rejects a suspension recommendation”, insert “and does not make a decision under paragraph (10B)”; (d) after paragraph (12), insert— (13) The Secretary of State may only make a request under paragraph (9)(b) where the Secretary of State considers that— (a) there is information that the TRA did not take into account in its consideration of whether the circumstances in paragraph (4) exist that is relevant to that consideration; (b) the TRA made an error in relation to its recommendation; or (c) exceptional circumstances make the request appropriate. (14) Before making a request under paragraph (9)(b), the Secretary of State must consult the TRA. (15) Where the Secretary of State makes a request under paragraph (9)(b), the TRA must— (a) comply with the request; and (b) in reassessing its recommendation, have regard to any particular considerations which the Secretary of State may specify in the request. .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds