The Official Controls (Location of Border Control Posts) (England) Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Amendments to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1012
(1) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1012 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council by derogating from the rules on the designation of control points and from the minimum requirements for border control posts is amended as follows. (2) In Article 3 (border control posts situated at a distance other than in the immediate vicinity of the point of entry into Great Britain)— (a) in paragraph 1— (i) in point (a), for “paragraph 2”, substitute “paragraphs 2 and 2A”; (ii) in point (b)— (aa) for “conditions”, substitute “condition”; (bb) for “are”, substitute “is”; (b) for paragraph 2, substitute— 2. The geographical constraints referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall be such as to prevent or restrict the efficient performance of official controls and other official activities if the border control post were located in the immediate vicinity of the point of entry, having regard to— (a) the nature and volume of official controls and other official activities which will be carried out at the border control post; and (b) the need to avoid any unacceptable adverse impact on the visual or natural amenity, environment, ecology or local character of the area surrounding the point of entry. 2A. The geographical constraints referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall consist of one or more of the following— (a) the natural geographical configuration of the point of entry or the surrounding area imposes major constraints on the transportation system; (b) the density of existing buildings and other structures at the point of entry or in the surrounding area, or the existing infrastructure at the point of entry or in the surrounding area, imposes major constraints on the transportation system; (c) the point of entry is subject to recurrent floods in certain periods of the year; (d) the point of entry comprises or contains maritime wharves surrounded by cliffs; (e) entry is by way of rail transport which makes it necessary to locate the border control post— (i) at the first station stop; or (ii) other than in the immediate vicinity of the first station stop if point (a), (b), (c), (f) or (g) applied in relation to locating the border control post at the first station stop as it applies in relation to locating the border control post at the point of entry (with references to “the point of entry” read as references to “the first station stop”); (f) there is no suitable land reasonably available to enable the border control post and its facilities to be located in the immediate vicinity of the point of entry; (g) there is a need to conserve or protect the visual or natural amenity, environment, ecology or local character of the area surrounding the point of entry. ; (c) for paragraph 3, substitute— 3. Where a competent authority decides to designate one or more border control posts referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authority must be satisfied that the person who will be responsible for operating the border control post will put in place adequate measures to manage any risk to human, animal or plant health or, as regards GMOs and plant protection products, any such risk or risk to the environment, arising from the location of the border control post. ; (d) after paragraph 4, insert— 5. The competent authority must, when deciding whether to designate a border control post referred to in paragraph 1, have regard to the following— (a) the distance of the border control post from the point of entry; (b) the amount of time it would be expected to take to move a consignment from the point of entry to the border control post; (c) the availability of suitable land for the border control post and its facilities; (d) the nature and volume of official controls and other official activities which will be carried out at the border control post; (e) the impact of the border control post on the surrounding area, including in respect of visual or natural amenity, environment, ecology, local character and infrastructure; (f) whether there is suitable existing infrastructure to enable the border control post to operate effectively; (g) the costs and economic impacts of the location of the border control post; (h) any other considerations that the competent authority considers to be relevant; and the competent authority may, if applicable, have regard to the desirability of designating a single border control post for more than one point of entry in a given area, provided that the condition in paragraph 1(a) is fulfilled in respect of each such point of entry. .
2 Amendments to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1012
(1) Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1012 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council by derogating from the rules on the designation of control points and from the minimum requirements for border control posts is amended as follows. (2) In Article 3 (border control posts situated at a distance other than in the immediate vicinity of the point of entry into Great Britain)— (a) in paragraph 1— (i) in point (a), for “paragraph 2”, substitute “paragraphs 2 and 2A”; (ii) in point (b)— (aa) for “conditions”, substitute “condition”; (bb) for “are”, substitute “is”; (b) for paragraph 2, substitute— 2. The geographical constraints referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall be such as to prevent or restrict the efficient performance of official controls and other official activities if the border control post were located in the immediate vicinity of the point of entry, having regard to— (a) the nature and volume of official controls and other official activities which will be carried out at the border control post; and (b) the need to avoid any unacceptable adverse impact on the visual or natural amenity, environment, ecology or local character of the area surrounding the point of entry. 2A. The geographical constraints referred to in paragraph 1(a) shall consist of one or more of the following— (a) the natural geographical configuration of the point of entry or the surrounding area imposes major constraints on the transportation system; (b) the density of existing buildings and other structures at the point of entry or in the surrounding area, or the existing infrastructure at the point of entry or in the surrounding area, imposes major constraints on the transportation system; (c) the point of entry is subject to recurrent floods in certain periods of the year; (d) the point of entry comprises or contains maritime wharves surrounded by cliffs; (e) entry is by way of rail transport which makes it necessary to locate the border control post— (i) at the first station stop; or (ii) other than in the immediate vicinity of the first station stop if point (a), (b), (c), (f) or (g) applied in relation to locating the border control post at the first station stop as it applies in relation to locating the border control post at the point of entry (with references to “the point of entry” read as references to “the first station stop”); (f) there is no suitable land reasonably available to enable the border control post and its facilities to be located in the immediate vicinity of the point of entry; (g) there is a need to conserve or protect the visual or natural amenity, environment, ecology or local character of the area surrounding the point of entry. ; (c) for paragraph 3, substitute— 3. Where a competent authority decides to designate one or more border control posts referred to in paragraph 1, the competent authority must be satisfied that the person who will be responsible for operating the border control post will put in place adequate measures to manage any risk to human, animal or plant health or, as regards GMOs and plant protection products, any such risk or risk to the environment, arising from the location of the border control post. ; (d) after paragraph 4, insert— 5. The competent authority must, when deciding whether to designate a border control post referred to in paragraph 1, have regard to the following— (a) the distance of the border control post from the point of entry; (b) the amount of time it would be expected to take to move a consignment from the point of entry to the border control post; (c) the availability of suitable land for the border control post and its facilities; (d) the nature and volume of official controls and other official activities which will be carried out at the border control post; (e) the impact of the border control post on the surrounding area, including in respect of visual or natural amenity, environment, ecology, local character and infrastructure; (f) whether there is suitable existing infrastructure to enable the border control post to operate effectively; (g) the costs and economic impacts of the location of the border control post; (h) any other considerations that the competent authority considers to be relevant; and the competent authority may, if applicable, have regard to the desirability of designating a single border control post for more than one point of entry in a given area, provided that the condition in paragraph 1(a) is fulfilled in respect of each such point of entry. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.