Transport and Works Act 1992
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
13B Application or proposal for an EIA order: reasoned conclusion
(1) Before making a determination under section 13(1) in respect of an application or proposal for an EIA order, the Secretary of State— (a) must consider the EIA information, and (b) following that consideration, must reach a reasoned conclusion about the likely significant effects of the proposed works or other projects on the environment. (2) The Secretary of State must obtain such expert advice as appears to the Secretary of State to be necessary for the purposes of considering the environmental statement. (3) When making a determination under section 13(1) in respect of an application or proposal for an EIA order, the Secretary of State must take into account the reasoned conclusion. (4) But the Secretary of State may determine to make an EIA order (whether with or without modifications) only if satisfied that the reasoned conclusion is up to date.
13B Application or proposal for an EIA order: reasoned conclusion
(1) Before making a determination under section 13(1) in respect of an application or proposal for an EIA order, the Secretary of State— (a) must consider the EIA information, and (b) following that consideration, must reach a reasoned conclusion about the likely significant effects of the proposed works or other projects on the environment. (2) The Secretary of State must obtain such expert advice as appears to the Secretary of State to be necessary for the purposes of considering the environmental statement. (3) When making a determination under section 13(1) in respect of an application or proposal for an EIA order, the Secretary of State must take into account the reasoned conclusion. (4) But the Secretary of State may determine to make an EIA order (whether with or without modifications) only if satisfied that the reasoned conclusion is up to date.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.