The Relevant Licensee Nuclear Company Administration (England and Wales) Rules 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
117 Requirement to assess costs by the detailed procedure
(1) Where the costs of any person are payable as an expense out of the assets of the relevant licensee nuclear company, the amount payable must be decided by detailed assessment unless agreed between the nuclear administrator and the person entitled to payment.
(2) In the absence of such agreement, the nuclear administrator may serve notice requiring the person entitled to payment to commence detailed assessment proceedings in accordance with CPR Part 47.
(3) Detailed assessment proceedings must be commenced in the court to which the relevant licensee nuclear company administration proceedings are allocated.
(4) Where the costs of any person employed by the nuclear administrator in relevant licensee nuclear company administration proceedings are required to be decided by detailed assessment or fixed by order of the court, the nuclear administrator may make payments on account to such person in respect of those costs provided that person undertakes in writing—
(a) to repay as soon as reasonably practicable any money which may, when detailed assessment is made, prove to have been overpaid, and
(b) to pay interest on any such sum as is mentioned in sub-paragraph (a) at the rate specified in section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838 on the date payment was made and for the period beginning with the date of payment and ending with the date of repayment.
(5) In any proceedings before the court, the court may order costs to be decided by detailed assessment.
Your change, as a redline
117 Requirement to assess costs by the detailed procedure
(1) Where the costs of any person are payable as an expense out of the assets of the relevant licensee nuclear company, the amount payable must be decided by detailed assessment unless agreed between the nuclear administrator and the person entitled to payment.
(2) In the absence of such agreement, the nuclear administrator may serve notice requiring the person entitled to payment to commence detailed assessment proceedings in accordance with CPR Part 47.
(3) Detailed assessment proceedings must be commenced in the court to which the relevant licensee nuclear company administration proceedings are allocated.
(4) Where the costs of any person employed by the nuclear administrator in relevant licensee nuclear company administration proceedings are required to be decided by detailed assessment or fixed by order of the court, the nuclear administrator may make payments on account to such person in respect of those costs provided that person undertakes in writing—
(a) to repay as soon as reasonably practicable any money which may, when detailed assessment is made, prove to have been overpaid, and
(b) to pay interest on any such sum as is mentioned in sub-paragraph (a) at the rate specified in section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838 on the date payment was made and for the period beginning with the date of payment and ending with the date of repayment.
(5) In any proceedings before the court, the court may order costs to be decided by detailed assessment.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.