The Relevant Licensee Nuclear Company Administration (England and Wales) Rules 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
42 Priority of expenses of relevant licensee nuclear company administration
(1) The expenses of the relevant licensee nuclear company administration are payable in the following order of priority— (a) expenses properly incurred by the nuclear administrator in performing the nuclear administrator’s functions in the relevant licensee nuclear company administration, except for those expenses referred to in sub-paragraph (g); (b) the cost of any security provided by the nuclear administrator in accordance with the 1986 Act or these Rules; (c) the costs of the applicant for the relevant licensee nuclear company administration order and any person appearing on the hearing of the application whose costs were allowed by the court; (d) any amount payable to a person in respect of assistance in the preparation of a statement of affairs or statement of concurrence; (e) any allowance made, by the order of the court, towards costs on an application for release from the obligation to submit a statement of affairs or statement of concurrence; (f) any necessary disbursements by the nuclear administrator in the course of the relevant licensee nuclear company administration (but not including any payment of corporation tax in circumstances referred to in sub-paragraph (i)); (g) the remuneration of any person who has been employed by the nuclear administrator to perform any services for the relevant licensee nuclear company, as required or authorised under the 1986 Act, the 2004 Act, the 2022 Act or these Rules; (h) the remuneration of the nuclear administrator fixed by the court under Part 8 and unpaid pre-relevant-licensee-nuclear-company-administration costs approved under rule 43; (i) the amount of any corporation tax on chargeable gains accruing on the realisation of any asset of the relevant licensee nuclear company, irrespective of the person by whom the realisation is effected. (2) The priorities laid down by paragraph (1) are subject to paragraph (3) and subject to the power of the court to make orders under paragraph (5) where the assets are insufficient to satisfy the liabilities. (3) Where there is a former nuclear administrator, the items in paragraph 99 of Schedule B1 to the 1986 Act are payable in priority to the expenses in this rule. (4) For the purposes of paragraph 99(3) of Schedule B1 to the 1986 Act, the former nuclear administrator’s remuneration and expenses shall comprise all those items set out in paragraph (1)(a) to (i) of this rule. (5) The court may, in the event of the assets being insufficient to satisfy the liabilities, make an order as to the payment out of the assets of the expenses incurred in the relevant licensee nuclear company administration in such order of priority as the court thinks just.
42 Priority of expenses of relevant licensee nuclear company administration
(1) The expenses of the relevant licensee nuclear company administration are payable in the following order of priority— (a) expenses properly incurred by the nuclear administrator in performing the nuclear administrator’s functions in the relevant licensee nuclear company administration, except for those expenses referred to in sub-paragraph (g); (b) the cost of any security provided by the nuclear administrator in accordance with the 1986 Act or these Rules; (c) the costs of the applicant for the relevant licensee nuclear company administration order and any person appearing on the hearing of the application whose costs were allowed by the court; (d) any amount payable to a person in respect of assistance in the preparation of a statement of affairs or statement of concurrence; (e) any allowance made, by the order of the court, towards costs on an application for release from the obligation to submit a statement of affairs or statement of concurrence; (f) any necessary disbursements by the nuclear administrator in the course of the relevant licensee nuclear company administration (but not including any payment of corporation tax in circumstances referred to in sub-paragraph (i)); (g) the remuneration of any person who has been employed by the nuclear administrator to perform any services for the relevant licensee nuclear company, as required or authorised under the 1986 Act, the 2004 Act, the 2022 Act or these Rules; (h) the remuneration of the nuclear administrator fixed by the court under Part 8 and unpaid pre-relevant-licensee-nuclear-company-administration costs approved under rule 43; (i) the amount of any corporation tax on chargeable gains accruing on the realisation of any asset of the relevant licensee nuclear company, irrespective of the person by whom the realisation is effected. (2) The priorities laid down by paragraph (1) are subject to paragraph (3) and subject to the power of the court to make orders under paragraph (5) where the assets are insufficient to satisfy the liabilities. (3) Where there is a former nuclear administrator, the items in paragraph 99 of Schedule B1 to the 1986 Act are payable in priority to the expenses in this rule. (4) For the purposes of paragraph 99(3) of Schedule B1 to the 1986 Act, the former nuclear administrator’s remuneration and expenses shall comprise all those items set out in paragraph (1)(a) to (i) of this rule. (5) The court may, in the event of the assets being insufficient to satisfy the liabilities, make an order as to the payment out of the assets of the expenses incurred in the relevant licensee nuclear company administration in such order of priority as the court thinks just.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.