Propose a change

The Relevant Licensee Nuclear Company Administration (England and Wales) Rules 2023

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

7 Witness statement in support of application

(1) An application for an RLNC administration order must be accompanied by a witness statement which complies with paragraphs (2) and (3). (2) The witness statement must state— (a) the nature of the authority of the person making it, and (b) the means of that person’s knowledge of the matters to which the witness statement relates. (3) The witness statement must set out the following— (a) the financial position of the relevant licensee nuclear company, specifying, to the best of the applicant’s knowledge and belief, the relevant licensee nuclear company’s assets and liabilities, including contingent and prospective liabilities; (b) details of any security known or believed to be held by creditors of the relevant licensee nuclear company and whether in any case the security is such as to confer power on the holder to appoint an administrative receiver or to appoint an administrator under paragraph 14 of Schedule B1 to the 1986 Act; (c) if a monitor under a moratorium under Part A1 of the 1986 Act has been appointed, a statement that this is the case; (d) if an administrative receiver has been appointed, a statement that this is the case; (e) details of any insolvency proceedings in relation to the relevant licensee nuclear company, including any petition that has been presented for the winding up of the relevant licensee nuclear company, so far as known to the applicant; (f) details of any notice served in accordance with section 164 of the 2004 Act by any person intending to enforce any security over the relevant licensee nuclear company’s assets, so far as within the immediate knowledge of the applicant; (g) details of any step taken to enforce any security over the relevant licensee nuclear company’s assets, so far as within the immediate knowledge of the applicant; (h) details of any application for permission of the court to pass a resolution for the voluntary winding up of the relevant licensee nuclear company, so far as within the immediate knowledge of the applicant; (i) where it is intended to appoint a number of persons as nuclear administrators, details of the matters set out in section 158(5) of the 2004 Act regarding the exercise of the powers and duties of the nuclear administrator; (j) any other matters which, in the opinion of those intending to make the application for an RLNC administration order, will assist the court in deciding whether to make such an order, so far as within the knowledge or belief of the applicant.

Your change, as a redline

7 Witness statement in support of application

(1) An application for an RLNC administration order must be accompanied by a witness statement which complies with paragraphs (2) and (3). (2) The witness statement must state— (a) the nature of the authority of the person making it, and (b) the means of that person’s knowledge of the matters to which the witness statement relates. (3) The witness statement must set out the following— (a) the financial position of the relevant licensee nuclear company, specifying, to the best of the applicant’s knowledge and belief, the relevant licensee nuclear company’s assets and liabilities, including contingent and prospective liabilities; (b) details of any security known or believed to be held by creditors of the relevant licensee nuclear company and whether in any case the security is such as to confer power on the holder to appoint an administrative receiver or to appoint an administrator under paragraph 14 of Schedule B1 to the 1986 Act; (c) if a monitor under a moratorium under Part A1 of the 1986 Act has been appointed, a statement that this is the case; (d) if an administrative receiver has been appointed, a statement that this is the case; (e) details of any insolvency proceedings in relation to the relevant licensee nuclear company, including any petition that has been presented for the winding up of the relevant licensee nuclear company, so far as known to the applicant; (f) details of any notice served in accordance with section 164 of the 2004 Act by any person intending to enforce any security over the relevant licensee nuclear company’s assets, so far as within the immediate knowledge of the applicant; (g) details of any step taken to enforce any security over the relevant licensee nuclear company’s assets, so far as within the immediate knowledge of the applicant; (h) details of any application for permission of the court to pass a resolution for the voluntary winding up of the relevant licensee nuclear company, so far as within the immediate knowledge of the applicant; (i) where it is intended to appoint a number of persons as nuclear administrators, details of the matters set out in section 158(5) of the 2004 Act regarding the exercise of the powers and duties of the nuclear administrator; (j) any other matters which, in the opinion of those intending to make the application for an RLNC administration order, will assist the court in deciding whether to make such an order, so far as within the knowledge or belief of the applicant.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds