Extradition Act 2003
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
106 Court’s powers on appeal under section 105
(1) On an appeal under section 105 the High Court may— (a) allow the appeal; (b) direct the judge to decide the relevant question again; (c) dismiss the appeal. (2) A question is the relevant question if the judge’s decision on it resulted in the order for the person’s discharge. (3) The court may allow the appeal only if the conditions in subsection (4) or the conditions in subsection (5) are satisfied. (4) The conditions are that— (a) the judge ought to have decided the relevant question differently; (b) if he had decided the question in the way he ought to have done, he would not have been required to order the person’s discharge. (5) The conditions are that— (a) an issue is raised that was not raised at the extradition hearing or evidence is available that was not available at the extradition hearing; (b) the issue or evidence would have resulted in the judge deciding the relevant question differently; (c) if he had decided the question in that way, he would not have been required to order the person’s discharge. (6) If the court allows the appeal it must— (a) quash the order discharging the person; (b) remit the case to the judge; (c) direct him to proceed as he would have been required to do if he had decided the relevant question differently at the extradition hearing. (7) If the court makes a direction under subsection (1)(b) and the judge decides the relevant question differently he must proceed as he would have been required to do if he had decided that question differently at the extradition hearing. (8) If the court makes a direction under subsection (1)(b) and the judge does not decide the relevant question differently the appeal must be taken to have been dismissed by a decision of the High Court. (9) If the court— (a) allows the appeal, or (b) makes a direction under subsection (1)(b), it must remand the person in custody or on bail. (10) If the court remands the person in custody it may later grant bail.
106 Court’s powers on appeal under section 105
(1) On an appeal under section 105 the High Court may— (a) allow the appeal; (b) direct the judge to decide the relevant question again; (c) dismiss the appeal. (2) A question is the relevant question if the judge’s decision on it resulted in the order for the person’s discharge. (3) The court may allow the appeal only if the conditions in subsection (4) or the conditions in subsection (5) are satisfied. (4) The conditions are that— (a) the judge ought to have decided the relevant question differently; (b) if he had decided the question in the way he ought to have done, he would not have been required to order the person’s discharge. (5) The conditions are that— (a) an issue is raised that was not raised at the extradition hearing or evidence is available that was not available at the extradition hearing; (b) the issue or evidence would have resulted in the judge deciding the relevant question differently; (c) if he had decided the question in that way, he would not have been required to order the person’s discharge. (6) If the court allows the appeal it must— (a) quash the order discharging the person; (b) remit the case to the judge; (c) direct him to proceed as he would have been required to do if he had decided the relevant question differently at the extradition hearing. (7) If the court makes a direction under subsection (1)(b) and the judge decides the relevant question differently he must proceed as he would have been required to do if he had decided that question differently at the extradition hearing. (8) If the court makes a direction under subsection (1)(b) and the judge does not decide the relevant question differently the appeal must be taken to have been dismissed by a decision of the High Court. (9) If the court— (a) allows the appeal, or (b) makes a direction under subsection (1)(b), it must remand the person in custody or on bail. (10) If the court remands the person in custody it may later grant bail.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.