Extradition Act 2003
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
115 Powers of Supreme Court on appeal under section 114
(1) On an appeal under section 114 the Supreme Court may— (a) allow the appeal; (b) dismiss the appeal. (2) Subsection (3) applies if— (a) the person whose extradition is requested brings an appeal under section 114, and (b) the Supreme Court allows the appeal. (3) The Supreme Court must— (a) order the person’s discharge; (b) quash the order for his extradition, if the appeal was against a decision of the High Court to dismiss an appeal under section 103 or 108 or to allow an appeal under section 110. (4) Subsection (5) applies if— (a) the High Court allows an appeal under section 103 or 108 by the person whose extradition is requested or dismisses an appeal under section 110 by a person acting on behalf of the category 2 territory, (b) a person acting on behalf of the category 2 territory brings an appeal under section 114 against the decision of the High Court, and (c) the Supreme Court allows the appeal. (5) The Supreme Court must— (a) quash the order discharging the person made by the High Court under section 104(5) or 109(5) or by the Secretary of State under this Part; (b) order the person to be extradited to the category 2 territory. (6) Subsection (7) applies if— (a) the High Court dismisses an appeal under section 105 against a decision made by the judge at the extradition hearing, (b) a person acting on behalf of the category 2 territory brings an appeal under section 114 against the decision of the High Court, and (c) the Supreme Court allows the appeal. (7) The Supreme Court must— (a) quash the order of the judge discharging the person whose extradition is requested; (b) remit the case to the judge; (c) direct him to proceed as he would have been required to do if he had decided the relevant question differently at the extradition hearing. (8) A question is the relevant question if the judge’s decision on it resulted in the order for the person’s discharge. (9) In a case where subsection (5) or (7) applies, the Supreme Court must remand, in custody or on bail, the person whose extradition is requested. (10) If the Supreme Court remands the person in custody the High Court may later grant bail.
115 Powers of Supreme Court on appeal under section 114
(1) On an appeal under section 114 the Supreme Court may— (a) allow the appeal; (b) dismiss the appeal. (2) Subsection (3) applies if— (a) the person whose extradition is requested brings an appeal under section 114, and (b) the Supreme Court allows the appeal. (3) The Supreme Court must— (a) order the person’s discharge; (b) quash the order for his extradition, if the appeal was against a decision of the High Court to dismiss an appeal under section 103 or 108 or to allow an appeal under section 110. (4) Subsection (5) applies if— (a) the High Court allows an appeal under section 103 or 108 by the person whose extradition is requested or dismisses an appeal under section 110 by a person acting on behalf of the category 2 territory, (b) a person acting on behalf of the category 2 territory brings an appeal under section 114 against the decision of the High Court, and (c) the Supreme Court allows the appeal. (5) The Supreme Court must— (a) quash the order discharging the person made by the High Court under section 104(5) or 109(5) or by the Secretary of State under this Part; (b) order the person to be extradited to the category 2 territory. (6) Subsection (7) applies if— (a) the High Court dismisses an appeal under section 105 against a decision made by the judge at the extradition hearing, (b) a person acting on behalf of the category 2 territory brings an appeal under section 114 against the decision of the High Court, and (c) the Supreme Court allows the appeal. (7) The Supreme Court must— (a) quash the order of the judge discharging the person whose extradition is requested; (b) remit the case to the judge; (c) direct him to proceed as he would have been required to do if he had decided the relevant question differently at the extradition hearing. (8) A question is the relevant question if the judge’s decision on it resulted in the order for the person’s discharge. (9) In a case where subsection (5) or (7) applies, the Supreme Court must remand, in custody or on bail, the person whose extradition is requested. (10) If the Supreme Court remands the person in custody the High Court may later grant bail.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.