Extradition Act 2003
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
121 Asylum claim
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) If— (a) an order is made under this Part for a person to be extradited in pursuance of a request, and (b) the person has made an asylum claim (whether before or after the making of the request), the person must not be extradited in pursuance of the request before the asylum claim is finally determined; and sections 117 and 118 have effect subject to this. (4) If the Secretary of State allows the asylum claim, the claim is finally determined when he makes his decision on the claim. (5) If the Secretary of State rejects the asylum claim, the claim is finally determined— (a) when the Secretary of State makes his decision on the claim, if there is no right to appeal against the Secretary of State’s decision on the claim; (b) when the period permitted for appealing against the Secretary of State’s decision on the claim ends, if there is such a right but there is no such appeal; (c) when the appeal against that decision is finally determined or is withdrawn or abandoned, if there is such an appeal. (6) An appeal against the Secretary of State’s decision on an asylum claim is not finally determined for the purposes of subsection (5) at any time when a further appeal or an application for leave to bring a further appeal— (a) has been instituted and has not been finally determined or withdrawn or abandoned, or (b) may be brought. (7) The remittal of an appeal is not a final determination for the purposes of subsection (6). (8) The possibility of an appeal out of time with leave must be ignored for the purposes of subsections (5) and (6).
121 Asylum claim
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) If— (a) an order is made under this Part for a person to be extradited in pursuance of a request, and (b) the person has made an asylum claim (whether before or after the making of the request), the person must not be extradited in pursuance of the request before the asylum claim is finally determined; and sections 117 and 118 have effect subject to this. (4) If the Secretary of State allows the asylum claim, the claim is finally determined when he makes his decision on the claim. (5) If the Secretary of State rejects the asylum claim, the claim is finally determined— (a) when the Secretary of State makes his decision on the claim, if there is no right to appeal against the Secretary of State’s decision on the claim; (b) when the period permitted for appealing against the Secretary of State’s decision on the claim ends, if there is such a right but there is no such appeal; (c) when the appeal against that decision is finally determined or is withdrawn or abandoned, if there is such an appeal. (6) An appeal against the Secretary of State’s decision on an asylum claim is not finally determined for the purposes of subsection (5) at any time when a further appeal or an application for leave to bring a further appeal— (a) has been instituted and has not been finally determined or withdrawn or abandoned, or (b) may be brought. (7) The remittal of an appeal is not a final determination for the purposes of subsection (6). (8) The possibility of an appeal out of time with leave must be ignored for the purposes of subsections (5) and (6).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.