Extradition Act 2003
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
19E Questioning of prosecutor's certificate
(1) No decision of a designated prosecutor relating to a prosecutor's certificate in respect of D's extradition (a “relevant certification decision”) may be questioned except on an appeal under section 26 against an order for that extradition. (2) In England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, for the purpose of— (a) determining whether to give permission for a relevant certification decision to be questioned, and (b) determining any such question (if that permission is given), the High Court must apply the procedures and principles which would be applied by it on an application for judicial review. (3) In Scotland, for the purpose of determining any questioning of a relevant certification decision, the High Court must apply the procedures and principles that would be applied by it on an application for judicial review. (4) In a case where the High Court quashes a prosecutor's certificate, the High Court is to decide the question of whether or not the extradition is barred by reason of forum. (5) Where the High Court is required to decide that question by virtue of subsection (4)— (a) sections 19B to 19D and this section apply in relation to that decision (with the appropriate modifications) as they apply to a decision by a judge; and (b) in particular— (i) a reference in this section to an appeal under section 26 has effect as a reference to an appeal under section 32 to the Supreme Court; (ii) a reference in this section to the High Court has effect as a reference to the Supreme Court.
19E Questioning of prosecutor's certificate
(1) No decision of a designated prosecutor relating to a prosecutor's certificate in respect of D's extradition (a “relevant certification decision”) may be questioned except on an appeal under section 26 against an order for that extradition. (2) In England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, for the purpose of— (a) determining whether to give permission for a relevant certification decision to be questioned, and (b) determining any such question (if that permission is given), the High Court must apply the procedures and principles which would be applied by it on an application for judicial review. (3) In Scotland, for the purpose of determining any questioning of a relevant certification decision, the High Court must apply the procedures and principles that would be applied by it on an application for judicial review. (4) In a case where the High Court quashes a prosecutor's certificate, the High Court is to decide the question of whether or not the extradition is barred by reason of forum. (5) Where the High Court is required to decide that question by virtue of subsection (4)— (a) sections 19B to 19D and this section apply in relation to that decision (with the appropriate modifications) as they apply to a decision by a judge; and (b) in particular— (i) a reference in this section to an appeal under section 26 has effect as a reference to an appeal under section 32 to the Supreme Court; (ii) a reference in this section to the High Court has effect as a reference to the Supreme Court.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.