Extradition Act 2003
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
58 Consent to further extradition to category 2 territory
(1) This section applies if— (a) a person is extradited to a category 1 territory (the requesting territory) in accordance with this Part; (b) the Secretary of State receives a request for consent to the person’s extradition to a category 2 territory for an offence; (c) the request is certified under this section by the designated authority. (2) The designated authority may certify a request for consent under this section if it believes that the authority making the request— (a) is a judicial authority of the requesting territory, and (b) has the function of making requests for the consent referred to in subsection (1)(b) in that territory. (3) A certificate under subsection (2) must certify that the authority making the request falls within paragraphs (a) and (b) of that subsection. (4) The Secretary of State must serve notice on the person that he has received the request for consent, unless he is satisfied that it would not be practicable to do so. (5) The Secretary of State must decide whether the offence is an extradition offence within the meaning given by section 137 in relation to the category 2 territory. (6) If the Secretary of State decides the question in subsection (5) in the negative he must refuse consent. (7) If the Secretary of State decides that question in the affirmative he must decide whether the appropriate judge would send the case to him (for his decision whether the person was to be extradited) under sections 79 to 91 if— (a) the person were in the United Kingdom, and (b) the judge were required to proceed under section 79 in respect of the offence for which the Secretary of State’s consent is requested. (8) If the Secretary of State decides the question in subsection (7) in the negative he must refuse his consent. (9) If the Secretary of State decides that question in the affirmative he must decide whether, if the person were in the United Kingdom, his extradition to the category 2 territory in respect of the offence would be prohibited under section 94, 95 or 96. (10) If the Secretary of State decides the question in subsection (9) in the negative he may give consent. (11) If the Secretary of State decides that question in the affirmative he must refuse consent. (12) This section applies in relation to any function which falls under this section to be exercised in relation to Scotland only as if the references in this section to the Secretary of State were to the Scottish Ministers.
58 Consent to further extradition to category 2 territory
(1) This section applies if— (a) a person is extradited to a category 1 territory (the requesting territory) in accordance with this Part; (b) the Secretary of State receives a request for consent to the person’s extradition to a category 2 territory for an offence; (c) the request is certified under this section by the designated authority. (2) The designated authority may certify a request for consent under this section if it believes that the authority making the request— (a) is a judicial authority of the requesting territory, and (b) has the function of making requests for the consent referred to in subsection (1)(b) in that territory. (3) A certificate under subsection (2) must certify that the authority making the request falls within paragraphs (a) and (b) of that subsection. (4) The Secretary of State must serve notice on the person that he has received the request for consent, unless he is satisfied that it would not be practicable to do so. (5) The Secretary of State must decide whether the offence is an extradition offence within the meaning given by section 137 in relation to the category 2 territory. (6) If the Secretary of State decides the question in subsection (5) in the negative he must refuse consent. (7) If the Secretary of State decides that question in the affirmative he must decide whether the appropriate judge would send the case to him (for his decision whether the person was to be extradited) under sections 79 to 91 if— (a) the person were in the United Kingdom, and (b) the judge were required to proceed under section 79 in respect of the offence for which the Secretary of State’s consent is requested. (8) If the Secretary of State decides the question in subsection (7) in the negative he must refuse his consent. (9) If the Secretary of State decides that question in the affirmative he must decide whether, if the person were in the United Kingdom, his extradition to the category 2 territory in respect of the offence would be prohibited under section 94, 95 or 96. (10) If the Secretary of State decides the question in subsection (9) in the negative he may give consent. (11) If the Secretary of State decides that question in the affirmative he must refuse consent. (12) This section applies in relation to any function which falls under this section to be exercised in relation to Scotland only as if the references in this section to the Secretary of State were to the Scottish Ministers.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.