Appropriation Act 2011
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
ABSTRACT OF SCHEDULE 2 (Appropriation of amounts and sums voted for supply services and limits on appropriations in aid)
Part | Net resources authorised for use | Grants out of the Consolidated Fund | Operating Appropriations in Aid | Non-operating Appropriations in Aid £ | £ | £ | £ 2009–10 and 2010–11 Part 1. Excesses, 2009–10 | 747,000 | 318,000 | 0 | 0 Part 2. Supplementary, 2010–11 | 41,538,735,000 | 13,899,227,000 | 1,014,109,000 | 1,018,631,000 Grand Total .................... | 41,539,482,000 | 13,899,545,000 | 1,014,109,000 | 1,018,631,000
ABSTRACT OF SCHEDULE 2 (Appropriation of amounts and sums voted for supply services and limits on appropriations in aid)
Part | Net resources authorised for use | Grants out of the Consolidated Fund | Operating Appropriations in Aid | Non-operating Appropriations in Aid £ | £ | £ | £ 2009–10 and 2010–11 Part 1. Excesses, 2009–10 | 747,000 | 318,000 | 0 | 0 Part 2. Supplementary, 2010–11 | 41,538,735,000 | 13,899,227,000 | 1,014,109,000 | 1,018,631,000 Grand Total .................... | 41,539,482,000 | 13,899,545,000 | 1,014,109,000 | 1,018,631,000
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.