Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
34A Professional training and development requirements
(1) Rules shall require registered dentists to undertake such professional training and development as may be specified in the rules.
(2) If it appears to the registrar that a person has failed to comply with the requirements of rules made under subsection (1), the registrar may erase the person’s name from the register.
(3) Where a person’s name has been erased from the register under subsection (2), that name shall be restored to the register on that person’s application if he satisfies the registrar that he meets the requirements of—
(a) section 15(3)(a) to (c);
(b) section 26A; and
(c) any rules made under section 34B which apply to his case.
(4) Rules shall specify the procedures to be followed before the registrar—
(a) may erase a person’s name from the register under subsection (2); or
(b) may make a decision whether or not to restore a person’s name to the register under subsection (3).
(5) Where, in the course of proceedings under this Part, it appears to the Investigating Committee, a Practice Committee or the Interim Orders Committee that a person to whose registration the proceedings relate may be failing to meet the requirements of rules made under subsection (1), that Committee may refer the question of whether he is failing to meet them to the registrar.
Your change, as a redline
34A Professional training and development requirements
(1) Rules shall require registered dentists to undertake such professional training and development as may be specified in the rules.
(2) If it appears to the registrar that a person has failed to comply with the requirements of rules made under subsection (1), the registrar may erase the person’s name from the register.
(3) Where a person’s name has been erased from the register under subsection (2), that name shall be restored to the register on that person’s application if he satisfies the registrar that he meets the requirements of—
(a) section 15(3)(a) to (c);
(b) section 26A; and
(c) any rules made under section 34B which apply to his case.
(4) Rules shall specify the procedures to be followed before the registrar—
(a) may erase a person’s name from the register under subsection (2); or
(b) may make a decision whether or not to restore a person’s name to the register under subsection (3).
(5) Where, in the course of proceedings under this Part, it appears to the Investigating Committee, a Practice Committee or the Interim Orders Committee that a person to whose registration the proceedings relate may be failing to meet the requirements of rules made under subsection (1), that Committee may refer the question of whether he is failing to meet them to the registrar.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.