Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
35 Effect on registration of disqualification in a relevant European State.
(1) A person who is subject to a disqualifying decision in a relevant European State in which he is or has been established in dental practice shall not be entitled to be registered under section 15(1)(c) in reliance on a relevant European diploma above.
(2) A disqualifying decision in a relevant European State in respect of a person is a decision made by responsible authorities in that State and—
(a) expressed to be made on the grounds that he has committed a criminal offence or on grounds related to his professional conduct, professional performance or physical or mental health, and
(b) having in that State the effect either that he is no longer registered or otherwise officially recognised as a dental practitioner, or that he is prohibited (whether on a permanent or temporary basis) from practising there.
(3) If a person has been registered under section 15(1)(c) in reliance on a relevant European diploma, or under subsection (1)(b) or (ba) of that section as it had effect before IP completion day, when he was subject to a disqualifying decision the registrar, on being satisfied that the person was at that time and still is subject to the decision, shall remove his name from the register.
(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) Where on or after the date on which a person was registered by virtue of section 15(1)(c) in reliance on a relevant European diploma, or under subsection (1)(b) or (ba) of that section as it had effect before IP completion day, a disqualifying decision relating to him comes into force, this Part shall apply, with any necessary modifications, as if it had been found that he had been convicted of the criminal offence referred to in the disqualifying decision, or that his professional conduct, professional performance or physical or mental health had been such as is imputed to him by that decision, as the case may be.
Your change, as a redline
35 Effect on registration of disqualification in a relevant European State.
(1) A person who is subject to a disqualifying decision in a relevant European State in which he is or has been established in dental practice shall not be entitled to be registered under section 15(1)(c) in reliance on a relevant European diploma above.
(2) A disqualifying decision in a relevant European State in respect of a person is a decision made by responsible authorities in that State and—
(a) expressed to be made on the grounds that he has committed a criminal offence or on grounds related to his professional conduct, professional performance or physical or mental health, and
(b) having in that State the effect either that he is no longer registered or otherwise officially recognised as a dental practitioner, or that he is prohibited (whether on a permanent or temporary basis) from practising there.
(3) If a person has been registered under section 15(1)(c) in reliance on a relevant European diploma, or under subsection (1)(b) or (ba) of that section as it had effect before IP completion day, when he was subject to a disqualifying decision the registrar, on being satisfied that the person was at that time and still is subject to the decision, shall remove his name from the register.
(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(5) Where on or after the date on which a person was registered by virtue of section 15(1)(c) in reliance on a relevant European diploma, or under subsection (1)(b) or (ba) of that section as it had effect before IP completion day, a disqualifying decision relating to him comes into force, this Part shall apply, with any necessary modifications, as if it had been found that he had been convicted of the criminal offence referred to in the disqualifying decision, or that his professional conduct, professional performance or physical or mental health had been such as is imputed to him by that decision, as the case may be.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.