Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
123 Benefit of obligation of responsible body
(1) Subject to the following provisions, an obligation of the responsible body under a conservation covenant is owed—
(a) to the landowner under the covenant, and
(b) to any person who becomes a successor of the landowner under the covenant.
(2) In this section “successor” (in relation to the landowner under the covenant) means a person who holds, in respect of any of the land to which the obligation relates—
(a) the qualifying estate, or
(b) an estate in land derived (whether immediately or otherwise) from the qualifying estate after the creation of the covenant.
(3) An obligation of the responsible body under a conservation covenant ceases to be owed to the landowner under the covenant, or to a person who becomes a successor of that landowner, in respect of—
(a) land which ceases to be land to which the obligation relates,
(b) in the case of the landowner under the covenant, land in relation to which the landowner ceases to be the holder of the qualifying estate, or
(c) in the case of a successor, land in relation to which the successor ceases to be the holder of the qualifying estate or of the estate derived from the qualifying estate, as the case may be.
(4) Subsection (1)(b) does not apply if the obligation is ancillary to an obligation of the landowner under the covenant which does not bind the successor.
Your change, as a redline
123 Benefit of obligation of responsible body
(1) Subject to the following provisions, an obligation of the responsible body under a conservation covenant is owed—
(a) to the landowner under the covenant, and
(b) to any person who becomes a successor of the landowner under the covenant.
(2) In this section “successor” (in relation to the landowner under the covenant) means a person who holds, in respect of any of the land to which the obligation relates—
(a) the qualifying estate, or
(b) an estate in land derived (whether immediately or otherwise) from the qualifying estate after the creation of the covenant.
(3) An obligation of the responsible body under a conservation covenant ceases to be owed to the landowner under the covenant, or to a person who becomes a successor of that landowner, in respect of—
(a) land which ceases to be land to which the obligation relates,
(b) in the case of the landowner under the covenant, land in relation to which the landowner ceases to be the holder of the qualifying estate, or
(c) in the case of a successor, land in relation to which the successor ceases to be the holder of the qualifying estate or of the estate derived from the qualifying estate, as the case may be.
(4) Subsection (1)(b) does not apply if the obligation is ancillary to an obligation of the landowner under the covenant which does not bind the successor.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.