The Equality Act 2010 (Equal Pay Audits) Regulations 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Circumstances in which an audit must not be ordered
(1) A tribunal must not order the respondent to carry out an audit where it considers that— (a) the information which would be required to be included in the audit under regulation 6 were the tribunal to make an order, is already available from an audit which has been completed by the respondent in the previous 3 years; (b) it is clear without an audit whether any action is required to avoid equal pay breaches occurring or continuing; (c) the breach which the tribunal has found gives no reason to think that there may be other breaches; or (d) the disadvantages of an audit would outweigh its benefits. (2) In paragraph (1), “previous 3 years” means the 3 years preceding the date on which the tribunal issues a judgment, orally or in writing, stating that there has been an equal pay breach.
3 Circumstances in which an audit must not be ordered
(1) A tribunal must not order the respondent to carry out an audit where it considers that— (a) the information which would be required to be included in the audit under regulation 6 were the tribunal to make an order, is already available from an audit which has been completed by the respondent in the previous 3 years; (b) it is clear without an audit whether any action is required to avoid equal pay breaches occurring or continuing; (c) the breach which the tribunal has found gives no reason to think that there may be other breaches; or (d) the disadvantages of an audit would outweigh its benefits. (2) In paragraph (1), “previous 3 years” means the 3 years preceding the date on which the tribunal issues a judgment, orally or in writing, stating that there has been an equal pay breach.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.