The Trade Remedies (Amendment) Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
17 Amendment of regulation 75 (TRA recommendation to the Secretary of State)
In regulation 75— (a) in paragraph (1), omit “(where applicable) the economic interest test is met and that”; (b) after paragraph (2), insert— (2A) Where, in relation to an early review, an interim review or an expiry review, the TRA considers that there are two or more options which it could recommend under paragraph (1), it may give the Secretary of State each of those options as part of its recommendation. (2B) The TRA must consider whether it could give the Secretary of State two or more options as part of its recommendation under paragraph (1)— (a) in the case of an interim review or an expiry review, where the TRA considers that applying an anti-dumping amount or a countervailing amount in accordance with its proposed recommendation would not meet the economic interest test; or (b) where the TRA otherwise considers that it is appropriate. (2C) Where, after considering whether it could give the Secretary of State two or more options as part of its recommendation in accordance with paragraph (2A), the TRA considers that there is only one option which it could reasonably recommend under paragraph (1), it must give the Secretary of State its reasons for reaching that conclusion. (2D) Where the TRA gives the Secretary of State options, it must— (a) give the Secretary of State its reasons for including each option; and (b) inform the Secretary of State which option it prefers and why. (2E) Where, in the case of an interim review or an expiry review, the TRA makes a recommendation under paragraph (1) to extend the application of an anti-dumping amount or a countervailing amount, it must advise the Secretary of State whether and why it considers that the extension of the application of that amount in accordance with its recommendation, or in accordance with each option, as the case may be, would meet the economic interest test. .
17 Amendment of regulation 75 (TRA recommendation to the Secretary of State)
In regulation 75— (a) in paragraph (1), omit “(where applicable) the economic interest test is met and that”; (b) after paragraph (2), insert— (2A) Where, in relation to an early review, an interim review or an expiry review, the TRA considers that there are two or more options which it could recommend under paragraph (1), it may give the Secretary of State each of those options as part of its recommendation. (2B) The TRA must consider whether it could give the Secretary of State two or more options as part of its recommendation under paragraph (1)— (a) in the case of an interim review or an expiry review, where the TRA considers that applying an anti-dumping amount or a countervailing amount in accordance with its proposed recommendation would not meet the economic interest test; or (b) where the TRA otherwise considers that it is appropriate. (2C) Where, after considering whether it could give the Secretary of State two or more options as part of its recommendation in accordance with paragraph (2A), the TRA considers that there is only one option which it could reasonably recommend under paragraph (1), it must give the Secretary of State its reasons for reaching that conclusion. (2D) Where the TRA gives the Secretary of State options, it must— (a) give the Secretary of State its reasons for including each option; and (b) inform the Secretary of State which option it prefers and why. (2E) Where, in the case of an interim review or an expiry review, the TRA makes a recommendation under paragraph (1) to extend the application of an anti-dumping amount or a countervailing amount, it must advise the Secretary of State whether and why it considers that the extension of the application of that amount in accordance with its recommendation, or in accordance with each option, as the case may be, would meet the economic interest test. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.