The Trade Remedies (Amendment) Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
26 Amendment of regulation 88G (determination to vary)
In regulation 88G— (a) for paragraph (1) substitute— (1) If the TRA determines the application to goods of an anti-dumping amount or a countervailing amount should be varied, the TRA must make a recommendation to the Secretary of State to that effect. ; (b) omit paragraph (2); (c) after paragraph (3), insert— (3A) Where, in relation to a recommendation under paragraph (1), the TRA considers that there are two or more options which it could recommend, it may give the Secretary of State each of those options as part of its recommendation. (3B) The TRA must consider whether it could give the Secretary of State two or more options as part of its recommendation under paragraph (1)— (a) where the TRA considers that varying an anti-dumping amount or a countervailing amount in accordance with its proposed recommendation would not meet the economic interest test; (b) where the TRA otherwise considers that it is appropriate. (3C) Where, after considering whether it could give the Secretary of State two or more options as part of its recommendation in accordance with paragraph (1), the TRA considers that there is only one option which it could reasonably recommend under paragraph (3A), it must give the Secretary of State its reasons for reaching that conclusion. (3D) Where the TRA gives the Secretary of State options, it must— (a) give the Secretary of State its reasons for including each option; and (b) inform the Secretary of State which option it prefers and why. (3E) Where the TRA makes a recommendation under paragraph (1), it must advise the Secretary of State whether and why it considers that varying the application of an anti-dumping amount or a countervailing amount, as the case may be, in accordance with its recommendation, or in accordance with each option, as the case may be, would meet the economic interest test (see paragraph 25 of Schedule 4 to the Act). ; (d) omit paragraphs (4) and (5).
26 Amendment of regulation 88G (determination to vary)
In regulation 88G— (a) for paragraph (1) substitute— (1) If the TRA determines the application to goods of an anti-dumping amount or a countervailing amount should be varied, the TRA must make a recommendation to the Secretary of State to that effect. ; (b) omit paragraph (2); (c) after paragraph (3), insert— (3A) Where, in relation to a recommendation under paragraph (1), the TRA considers that there are two or more options which it could recommend, it may give the Secretary of State each of those options as part of its recommendation. (3B) The TRA must consider whether it could give the Secretary of State two or more options as part of its recommendation under paragraph (1)— (a) where the TRA considers that varying an anti-dumping amount or a countervailing amount in accordance with its proposed recommendation would not meet the economic interest test; (b) where the TRA otherwise considers that it is appropriate. (3C) Where, after considering whether it could give the Secretary of State two or more options as part of its recommendation in accordance with paragraph (1), the TRA considers that there is only one option which it could reasonably recommend under paragraph (3A), it must give the Secretary of State its reasons for reaching that conclusion. (3D) Where the TRA gives the Secretary of State options, it must— (a) give the Secretary of State its reasons for including each option; and (b) inform the Secretary of State which option it prefers and why. (3E) Where the TRA makes a recommendation under paragraph (1), it must advise the Secretary of State whether and why it considers that varying the application of an anti-dumping amount or a countervailing amount, as the case may be, in accordance with its recommendation, or in accordance with each option, as the case may be, would meet the economic interest test (see paragraph 25 of Schedule 4 to the Act). ; (d) omit paragraphs (4) and (5).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.