The Climate Change Agreements (Administration, Energy-intensive Installations and Eligible Facilities) (Amendment and Revocation) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Modification to the Waste Framework Directive
(1) For the purposes of the interpretation of these Regulations, the Waste Framework Directive is to be read as follows. (2) Article 2 is to be read as if— (a) in paragraph 2— (i) in the words before point (a), for “other Community legislation” there were substituted “assimilated law”; (ii) in points (b) and (c), for “Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002” there were substituted “Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009”; (iii) in point (d), for the words from “Directive 2006/21/EC” to the end there were substituted “Article 2(1) of the Mining Waste Directive, and not excluded by Article 2(2) of that Directive”; (b) in paragraph 3, the words from “Without prejudice” to “Community legislation,” were omitted. (3) Annex III is to be read as if— (a) in entry HP 9 (“infectious”), in the second sentence, for the words from “reference” to the end substitute “Part C9 of Appendix C to the waste classification technical guidance.”; (b) in entry HP 15 (“waste capable of exhibiting a hazardous property listed above but not directly displayed by the original waste”), in the sentence after the table, for the words from “In addition” to the end substitute “The attribution of HP 15 shall be assessed by the rules laid down in Part C15 of Appendix C to the waste classification technical guidance.”; (c) in the entry for test methods, for the words from “other relevant CEN notes” to the end substitute “Appendix D to the waste classification technical guidance.”.
3 Modification to the Waste Framework Directive
(1) For the purposes of the interpretation of these Regulations, the Waste Framework Directive is to be read as follows. (2) Article 2 is to be read as if— (a) in paragraph 2— (i) in the words before point (a), for “other Community legislation” there were substituted “assimilated law”; (ii) in points (b) and (c), for “Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002” there were substituted “Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009”; (iii) in point (d), for the words from “Directive 2006/21/EC” to the end there were substituted “Article 2(1) of the Mining Waste Directive, and not excluded by Article 2(2) of that Directive”; (b) in paragraph 3, the words from “Without prejudice” to “Community legislation,” were omitted. (3) Annex III is to be read as if— (a) in entry HP 9 (“infectious”), in the second sentence, for the words from “reference” to the end substitute “Part C9 of Appendix C to the waste classification technical guidance.”; (b) in entry HP 15 (“waste capable of exhibiting a hazardous property listed above but not directly displayed by the original waste”), in the sentence after the table, for the words from “In addition” to the end substitute “The attribution of HP 15 shall be assessed by the rules laid down in Part C15 of Appendix C to the waste classification technical guidance.”; (c) in the entry for test methods, for the words from “other relevant CEN notes” to the end substitute “Appendix D to the waste classification technical guidance.”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.