Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
1 Objectives of Prudential Regulation Authority
(1) Section 2B of FSMA 2000 (the PRA's general objective) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (3)—
(a) at the end of paragraph (a), omit “and”, and
(b) after paragraph (b) insert
, and
(c) discharging its general functions in relation to the matters mentioned in subsection (4A) in a way that seeks to—
(i) ensure that the business of ring-fenced bodies is carried on in a way that avoids any adverse effect on the continuity of the provision in the United Kingdom of core services,
(ii) ensure that the business of ring-fenced bodies is protected from risks (arising in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) that could adversely affect the continuity of the provision in the United Kingdom of core services, and
(iii) minimise the risk that the failure of a ring-fenced body or of a member of a ring-fenced body's group could affect the continuity of the provision in the United Kingdom of core services.
(3) In subsection (4), for “subsection (3)” substitute “ subsection (3)(a) and (b) ”.
(4) After subsection (4) insert—
(4A) The matters referred to in subsection (3)(c) are—
(a) Part 9B (ring-fencing);
(b) ring-fenced bodies (see section 142A);
(c) any body corporate incorporated in the United Kingdom that has a ring-fenced body as a member of its group;
(d) applications under Part 4A which, if granted, would result, or would be capable of resulting, in a person becoming a ring-fenced body.
(5) In section 2J of FSMA 2000 (interpretation of Chapter 2 of Part 1)—
(a) in subsection (3), for “a PRA-authorised” substitute “ an authorised ”,
(b) after that subsection insert—
(3A) For the purposes of this Chapter, the cases in which a person (“P”) other than an authorised person is to be regarded as failing include any case where P enters insolvency.
, and
(c) in subsection (4), for “subsection (3)(a)” substitute “ subsections (3)(a) and (3A) ”.
Your change, as a redline
1 Objectives of Prudential Regulation Authority
(1) Section 2B of FSMA 2000 (the PRA's general objective) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (3)—
(a) at the end of paragraph (a), omit “and”, and
(b) after paragraph (b) insert
, and
(c) discharging its general functions in relation to the matters mentioned in subsection (4A) in a way that seeks to—
(i) ensure that the business of ring-fenced bodies is carried on in a way that avoids any adverse effect on the continuity of the provision in the United Kingdom of core services,
(ii) ensure that the business of ring-fenced bodies is protected from risks (arising in the United Kingdom or elsewhere) that could adversely affect the continuity of the provision in the United Kingdom of core services, and
(iii) minimise the risk that the failure of a ring-fenced body or of a member of a ring-fenced body's group could affect the continuity of the provision in the United Kingdom of core services.
(3) In subsection (4), for “subsection (3)” substitute “ subsection (3)(a) and (b) ”.
(4) After subsection (4) insert—
(4A) The matters referred to in subsection (3)(c) are—
(a) Part 9B (ring-fencing);
(b) ring-fenced bodies (see section 142A);
(c) any body corporate incorporated in the United Kingdom that has a ring-fenced body as a member of its group;
(d) applications under Part 4A which, if granted, would result, or would be capable of resulting, in a person becoming a ring-fenced body.
(5) In section 2J of FSMA 2000 (interpretation of Chapter 2 of Part 1)—
(a) in subsection (3), for “a PRA-authorised” substitute “ an authorised ”,
(b) after that subsection insert—
(3A) For the purposes of this Chapter, the cases in which a person (“P”) other than an authorised person is to be regarded as failing include any case where P enters insolvency.
, and
(c) in subsection (4), for “subsection (3)(a)” substitute “ subsections (3)(a) and (3A) ”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.