Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
25 Duty to notify regulator of grounds for withdrawal of approval
In section 63 of FSMA 2000 (withdrawal of approval), after subsection (2) insert— (2A) At least once a year each relevant authorised person must, in relation to every person in relation to whom an approval has been given on the application of the authorised person— (a) consider whether there are any grounds on which a regulator could withdraw the approval under this section, and (b) if the authorised person is of the opinion that there are such grounds, notify the regulator of those grounds. (For the meaning of “relevant authorised person”, see section 71A.)
25 Duty to notify regulator of grounds for withdrawal of approval
In section 63 of FSMA 2000 (withdrawal of approval), after subsection (2) insert— (2A) At least once a year each relevant authorised person must, in relation to every person in relation to whom an approval has been given on the application of the authorised person— (a) consider whether there are any grounds on which a regulator could withdraw the approval under this section, and (b) if the authorised person is of the opinion that there are such grounds, notify the regulator of those grounds. (For the meaning of “relevant authorised person”, see section 71A.)
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.