Propose a change

Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

58 Power to require disposal of interest in payment system

(1) The Payment Systems Regulator may require a person who has an interest in — (a) the operator of a regulated payment system, or (b) an infrastructure provider in relation to such a system, to dispose of all or part of that interest. (2) The power conferred by subsection (1) may be exercised only if the Payment Systems Regulator is satisfied that, if the power is not exercised, there is likely to be a restriction or distortion of competition in— (a) the market for payment systems, or (b) a market for services provided by payment systems. (2A) The reference in subsection (2) to a restriction or distortion of competition includes, in particular, a restriction or distortion of competition— (a) between different operators of payment systems, (b) between different payment services providers, or (c) between different infrastructure providers. (3) The Payment Systems Regulator may not exercise the power conferred by subsection (1) without the consent of the Treasury. (4) If the Payment Systems Regulator decides to exercise the power conferred by subsection (1) in relation to a person who has an interest in the operator of a regulated payment system— (a) the Payment Systems Regulator must notify the relevant competition authorities (see subsection (5)), and (b) the relevant competition authorities may not take any action in relation to the person that would require the person to dispose of all or part of that interest. (5) The relevant competition authorities are— (a) the Secretary of State, (b) the Competition and Markets Authority, and (c) the FCA.

Your change, as a redline

58 Power to require disposal of interest in payment system

(1) The Payment Systems Regulator may require a person who has an interest in — (a) the operator of a regulated payment system, or (b) an infrastructure provider in relation to such a system, to dispose of all or part of that interest. (2) The power conferred by subsection (1) may be exercised only if the Payment Systems Regulator is satisfied that, if the power is not exercised, there is likely to be a restriction or distortion of competition in— (a) the market for payment systems, or (b) a market for services provided by payment systems. (2A) The reference in subsection (2) to a restriction or distortion of competition includes, in particular, a restriction or distortion of competition— (a) between different operators of payment systems, (b) between different payment services providers, or (c) between different infrastructure providers. (3) The Payment Systems Regulator may not exercise the power conferred by subsection (1) without the consent of the Treasury. (4) If the Payment Systems Regulator decides to exercise the power conferred by subsection (1) in relation to a person who has an interest in the operator of a regulated payment system— (a) the Payment Systems Regulator must notify the relevant competition authorities (see subsection (5)), and (b) the relevant competition authorities may not take any action in relation to the person that would require the person to dispose of all or part of that interest. (5) The relevant competition authorities are— (a) the Secretary of State, (b) the Competition and Markets Authority, and (c) the FCA.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds