Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
67 Amendments relating to Regulator's competition powers
(1) In section 9E of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (interpretation of sections 9A to 9D), in subsection (2), after paragraph (f) insert—
(g) the Payment Systems Regulator established under section 40 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
(2) In section 54 of the Competition Act 1998 (regulators), in subsection (1), omit the “and” at the end of paragraph (g) and after paragraph (h) insert—
(i) the Payment Systems Regulator established under section 40 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
(3) In section 136 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (investigations and reports on market investigation references)—
(a) in subsection (7), at the end insert—
(j) in relation to the Payment Systems Regulator, section 59 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
;
(b) in subsection (8), for “or Monitor” substitute “ , Monitor or the Payment Systems Regulator. ”;
(c) at the end insert—
(10) In this section “the Payment Systems Regulator” means the body established under section 40 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
(4) In section 52(4) of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (power to remove concurrent competition functions of sectoral regulators), after paragraph (f) insert—
(g) the Payment Systems Regulator established under section 40 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
(5) In Schedule 4 to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (the Competition and Markets Authority), in paragraph 16 (concurrency report), at the end of sub-paragraph (7) insert—
(h) the Payment Systems Regulator established under section 40 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
Your change, as a redline
67 Amendments relating to Regulator's competition powers
(1) In section 9E of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (interpretation of sections 9A to 9D), in subsection (2), after paragraph (f) insert—
(g) the Payment Systems Regulator established under section 40 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
(2) In section 54 of the Competition Act 1998 (regulators), in subsection (1), omit the “and” at the end of paragraph (g) and after paragraph (h) insert—
(i) the Payment Systems Regulator established under section 40 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
(3) In section 136 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (investigations and reports on market investigation references)—
(a) in subsection (7), at the end insert—
(j) in relation to the Payment Systems Regulator, section 59 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
;
(b) in subsection (8), for “or Monitor” substitute “ , Monitor or the Payment Systems Regulator. ”;
(c) at the end insert—
(10) In this section “the Payment Systems Regulator” means the body established under section 40 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
(4) In section 52(4) of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (power to remove concurrent competition functions of sectoral regulators), after paragraph (f) insert—
(g) the Payment Systems Regulator established under section 40 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
(5) In Schedule 4 to the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (the Competition and Markets Authority), in paragraph 16 (concurrency report), at the end of sub-paragraph (7) insert—
(h) the Payment Systems Regulator established under section 40 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.