Localism Act 2011
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
92 Review of decision to include land in list
(1) The owner of land included in a local authority's list of assets of community value may ask the authority to review the authority's decision to include the land in the list. (2) If a request is made— (a) under subsection (1), and (b) in accordance with the time limits (if any) provided for in regulations under subsection (5), the authority concerned must review its decision. (3) Where under subsection (2) an authority reviews a decision, the authority must notify the person who asked for the review— (a) of the decision on the review, and (b) of the reasons for the decision. (4) If the decision on a review under subsection (2) is that the land concerned should not have been included in the authority's list of assets of community value— (a) the authority must remove the entry for the land from the list, and (b) where the land was included in the list in response to a community nomination— (i) the nomination becomes unsuccessful, and (ii) the authority must give a written copy of the reasons mentioned in subsection (3)(b) to the person who made the nomination. (5) The appropriate authority may by regulations make provision as to the procedure to be followed in connection with a review under this section. (6) Regulations under subsection (5) may (in particular) include— (a) provision as to time limits; (b) provision requiring the decision on the review to be made by a person of appropriate seniority who was not involved in the original decision; (c) provision as to the circumstances in which the person asking for the review is entitled to an oral hearing, and whether and by whom that person may be represented at the hearing; (d) provision for appeals against the decision on the review.
92 Review of decision to include land in list
(1) The owner of land included in a local authority's list of assets of community value may ask the authority to review the authority's decision to include the land in the list. (2) If a request is made— (a) under subsection (1), and (b) in accordance with the time limits (if any) provided for in regulations under subsection (5), the authority concerned must review its decision. (3) Where under subsection (2) an authority reviews a decision, the authority must notify the person who asked for the review— (a) of the decision on the review, and (b) of the reasons for the decision. (4) If the decision on a review under subsection (2) is that the land concerned should not have been included in the authority's list of assets of community value— (a) the authority must remove the entry for the land from the list, and (b) where the land was included in the list in response to a community nomination— (i) the nomination becomes unsuccessful, and (ii) the authority must give a written copy of the reasons mentioned in subsection (3)(b) to the person who made the nomination. (5) The appropriate authority may by regulations make provision as to the procedure to be followed in connection with a review under this section. (6) Regulations under subsection (5) may (in particular) include— (a) provision as to time limits; (b) provision requiring the decision on the review to be made by a person of appropriate seniority who was not involved in the original decision; (c) provision as to the circumstances in which the person asking for the review is entitled to an oral hearing, and whether and by whom that person may be represented at the hearing; (d) provision for appeals against the decision on the review.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.