Social Security (Recovery of Benefits) Act 1997
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
8 Reduction of compensation payment.
(1) This section applies in a case where, in relation to any head of compensation listed in column 1 of Schedule 2— (a) any of the compensation payment is attributable to that head, and (b) any recoverable benefit is shown against that head in column 2 of the Schedule. (2) In such a case, any claim of a person to receive the compensation payment is to be treated for all purposes as discharged if— (a) he is paid the amount (if any) of the compensation payment calculated in accordance with this section, and (b) if the amount of the compensation payment so calculated is nil, he is given a statement saying so by the person who (apart from this section) would have paid the gross amount of the compensation payment. (3) For each head of compensation listed in column 1 of the Schedule for which paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (1) are met, so much of the gross amount of the compensation payment as is attributable to that head is to be reduced (to nil, if necessary) by deducting the amount of the recoverable benefit or, as the case may be, the aggregate amount of the recoverable benefits shown against it. (4) Subsection (3) is to have effect as if a requirement to reduce a payment by deducting an amount which exceeds that payment were a requirement to reduce that payment to nil. (5) The amount of the compensation payment calculated in accordance with this section is— (a) the gross amount of the compensation payment, less (b) the sum of the reductions made under subsection (3), (and, accordingly, the amount may be nil).
8 Reduction of compensation payment.
(1) This section applies in a case where, in relation to any head of compensation listed in column 1 of Schedule 2— (a) any of the compensation payment is attributable to that head, and (b) any recoverable benefit is shown against that head in column 2 of the Schedule. (2) In such a case, any claim of a person to receive the compensation payment is to be treated for all purposes as discharged if— (a) he is paid the amount (if any) of the compensation payment calculated in accordance with this section, and (b) if the amount of the compensation payment so calculated is nil, he is given a statement saying so by the person who (apart from this section) would have paid the gross amount of the compensation payment. (3) For each head of compensation listed in column 1 of the Schedule for which paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (1) are met, so much of the gross amount of the compensation payment as is attributable to that head is to be reduced (to nil, if necessary) by deducting the amount of the recoverable benefit or, as the case may be, the aggregate amount of the recoverable benefits shown against it. (4) Subsection (3) is to have effect as if a requirement to reduce a payment by deducting an amount which exceeds that payment were a requirement to reduce that payment to nil. (5) The amount of the compensation payment calculated in accordance with this section is— (a) the gross amount of the compensation payment, less (b) the sum of the reductions made under subsection (3), (and, accordingly, the amount may be nil).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.