Guardianship (Missing Persons) Act 2017
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
11 Actions outside guardian's authority etc
(1) The court may make a declaration— (a) that action taken by a guardian, when purporting to exercise functions as a guardian, was within or outside the scope of the guardian's authority under the guardianship order and this Act, or (b) that a guardian performed or failed to perform a duty under the guardianship order, this Act or regulations under section 58 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 or a duty owed to the missing person under a rule of law. (2) It may do so on an application or without an application being made (and see sections 19 and 20). (3) If the court makes a declaration under subsection (1) that a guardian acted outside the scope of the guardian's authority or failed to perform a duty as described in that subsection, it may— (a) make an order disallowing expenses incurred by the guardian or remuneration to which the guardian would otherwise be entitled; (b) make an order requiring the guardian to make a payment of an amount determined by the court to the missing person or the missing person's estate; (c) make such other order as the court considers appropriate for the purpose of compensating the missing person or the missing person's estate for any loss resulting from the action or failure. (4) Subsection (3) does not prevent the court from exercising powers available to it otherwise than by virtue of that subsection. (5) If the court makes a declaration under subsection (1), or otherwise determines, that a guardian acted outside the scope of the guardian's authority or failed to perform a duty as described in that subsection but— (a) the guardian shows that the guardian behaved honestly and reasonably in doing so, and (b) the court considers that, having regard to all the circumstances, the guardian ought to be relieved of personal liability, the court may relieve the guardian, either entirely or partly, of personal liability in respect of the action or failure. (6) In considering whether to relieve a guardian of personal liability, the court must have regard to— (a) the care and skill that it is reasonable to expect the guardian to have exercised in the circumstances, and (b) in the case of a person acting as a guardian in the course of a business or profession, any special knowledge or experience that it is reasonable to expect of a person acting in the course of that kind of business or profession.
11 Actions outside guardian's authority etc
(1) The court may make a declaration— (a) that action taken by a guardian, when purporting to exercise functions as a guardian, was within or outside the scope of the guardian's authority under the guardianship order and this Act, or (b) that a guardian performed or failed to perform a duty under the guardianship order, this Act or regulations under section 58 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 or a duty owed to the missing person under a rule of law. (2) It may do so on an application or without an application being made (and see sections 19 and 20). (3) If the court makes a declaration under subsection (1) that a guardian acted outside the scope of the guardian's authority or failed to perform a duty as described in that subsection, it may— (a) make an order disallowing expenses incurred by the guardian or remuneration to which the guardian would otherwise be entitled; (b) make an order requiring the guardian to make a payment of an amount determined by the court to the missing person or the missing person's estate; (c) make such other order as the court considers appropriate for the purpose of compensating the missing person or the missing person's estate for any loss resulting from the action or failure. (4) Subsection (3) does not prevent the court from exercising powers available to it otherwise than by virtue of that subsection. (5) If the court makes a declaration under subsection (1), or otherwise determines, that a guardian acted outside the scope of the guardian's authority or failed to perform a duty as described in that subsection but— (a) the guardian shows that the guardian behaved honestly and reasonably in doing so, and (b) the court considers that, having regard to all the circumstances, the guardian ought to be relieved of personal liability, the court may relieve the guardian, either entirely or partly, of personal liability in respect of the action or failure. (6) In considering whether to relieve a guardian of personal liability, the court must have regard to— (a) the care and skill that it is reasonable to expect the guardian to have exercised in the circumstances, and (b) in the case of a person acting as a guardian in the course of a business or profession, any special knowledge or experience that it is reasonable to expect of a person acting in the course of that kind of business or profession.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.