Propose a change

Scotland Act 2016

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

65 Office of Communications

(1) Section 1 of the Office of Communications Act 2002 (the Office of Communications) is amended as follows. (2) In subsection (3) after paragraph (a) insert— (aa) a member appointed by the Scottish Ministers; . (3) After subsection (3) insert— (3A) Before appointing a member under subsection (3)(aa) the Scottish Ministers must consult the Secretary of State. (4) In subsection (5) after “(3)(a)” insert “ , (aa) ”. (5) After subsection (10) insert— (11) Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Schedule apply in relation to the appointment made under subsection (3)(aa) as if— (a) any reference to the Secretary of State was to the Scottish Ministers, and (b) after paragraph 2(6) there were inserted— (7) Before the Scottish Ministers remove a person from office they must consult the Secretary of State. (6) The Schedule to the Office of Communications Act 2002 is amended as follows. (7) In paragraph 11(3) (accounts and audit)— (a) omit “and” at the end of paragraph (a), and (b) at the end of paragraph (b) insert , and (c) send a copy of the statement and of his report to the Scottish Ministers. (8) After paragraph 11(3) insert— (4) The Scottish Ministers shall lay a copy of the statement and report sent to them under sub-paragraph (3) before the Scottish Parliament. (9) In paragraph 12 (annual report)— (a) in sub-paragraph (1) after “Secretary of State” insert “ and the Scottish Ministers ”, and (b) after sub-paragraph (3) insert— (4) The Scottish Ministers shall lay a copy of every report sent to them under this paragraph before the Scottish Parliament. (10) In article 2(2) of the Public Appointments Order in Council 2014 (interpretation) in paragraph (a) of the definition of “appointing authority” after “as the case may be,” insert “ the Scottish Ministers, ”.

Your change, as a redline

65 Office of Communications

(1) Section 1 of the Office of Communications Act 2002 (the Office of Communications) is amended as follows. (2) In subsection (3) after paragraph (a) insert— (aa) a member appointed by the Scottish Ministers; . (3) After subsection (3) insert— (3A) Before appointing a member under subsection (3)(aa) the Scottish Ministers must consult the Secretary of State. (4) In subsection (5) after “(3)(a)” insert “ , (aa) ”. (5) After subsection (10) insert— (11) Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Schedule apply in relation to the appointment made under subsection (3)(aa) as if— (a) any reference to the Secretary of State was to the Scottish Ministers, and (b) after paragraph 2(6) there were inserted— (7) Before the Scottish Ministers remove a person from office they must consult the Secretary of State. (6) The Schedule to the Office of Communications Act 2002 is amended as follows. (7) In paragraph 11(3) (accounts and audit)— (a) omit “and” at the end of paragraph (a), and (b) at the end of paragraph (b) insert , and (c) send a copy of the statement and of his report to the Scottish Ministers. (8) After paragraph 11(3) insert— (4) The Scottish Ministers shall lay a copy of the statement and report sent to them under sub-paragraph (3) before the Scottish Parliament. (9) In paragraph 12 (annual report)— (a) in sub-paragraph (1) after “Secretary of State” insert “ and the Scottish Ministers ”, and (b) after sub-paragraph (3) insert— (4) The Scottish Ministers shall lay a copy of every report sent to them under this paragraph before the Scottish Parliament. (10) In article 2(2) of the Public Appointments Order in Council 2014 (interpretation) in paragraph (a) of the definition of “appointing authority” after “as the case may be,” insert “ the Scottish Ministers, ”.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds