The Tribunal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Amendments to the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009
(1) The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 are amended as follows. (2) In rule 22(6) (the notice of appeal)— (a) at the end of sub-paragraph (l) insert “or”; and (b) after sub-paragraph (l) insert— (m) in an appeal under regulation 30(5) or (7) of the Biodiversity Gain Site Register Regulations 2024, within 28 days beginning with the day after the date on which the entry on the biodiversity gain site register was amended or removed. .
3 Amendments to the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009
(1) The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 are amended as follows. (2) In rule 22(6) (the notice of appeal)— (a) at the end of sub-paragraph (l) insert “or”; and (b) after sub-paragraph (l) insert— (m) in an appeal under regulation 30(5) or (7) of the Biodiversity Gain Site Register Regulations 2024, within 28 days beginning with the day after the date on which the entry on the biodiversity gain site register was amended or removed. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.