Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
29A Practice directions
(1) Directions about the practice and procedure of the Appeal Tribunal may be given— (a) by the Senior President of Tribunals, or (b) by the President of the Appeal Tribunal. (2) A power under subsection (1) includes— (a) power to vary or revoke directions given in exercise of the power, and (b) power to make different provision for different purposes. (3) Directions under subsection (1)(a) may not be given without the approval of the Lord Chancellor. (4) Directions under subsection (1)(b) may not be given without the approval of— (a) the Senior President of Tribunals, and (b) the Lord Chancellor. (5) Subsection (1) does not prejudice any power apart from that subsection to give directions about the practice or procedure of the Appeal Tribunal. (6) Directions may not be given in exercise of any such power as is mentioned in subsection (5) without the approval of— (a) the Senior President of Tribunals, and (b) the Lord Chancellor. (7) Subsections (3), (4)(b) and (6)(b) do not apply to directions to the extent that they consist of guidance about any of the following— (a) the application or interpretation of the law; (b) the making of decisions by members of the Appeal Tribunal. (8) Subsections (3), (4)(b) and (6)(b) do not apply to directions to the extent that they consist of criteria for determining which members of the Appeal Tribunal may be chosen to decide particular categories of matter; but the directions may, to that extent, be given only after consulting the Lord Chancellor. (9) Subsections (4) and (6) do not apply to directions given in a particular case for the purposes of that case only. (10) Subsection (6) does not apply to directions under section 28(1).
29A Practice directions
(1) Directions about the practice and procedure of the Appeal Tribunal may be given— (a) by the Senior President of Tribunals, or (b) by the President of the Appeal Tribunal. (2) A power under subsection (1) includes— (a) power to vary or revoke directions given in exercise of the power, and (b) power to make different provision for different purposes. (3) Directions under subsection (1)(a) may not be given without the approval of the Lord Chancellor. (4) Directions under subsection (1)(b) may not be given without the approval of— (a) the Senior President of Tribunals, and (b) the Lord Chancellor. (5) Subsection (1) does not prejudice any power apart from that subsection to give directions about the practice or procedure of the Appeal Tribunal. (6) Directions may not be given in exercise of any such power as is mentioned in subsection (5) without the approval of— (a) the Senior President of Tribunals, and (b) the Lord Chancellor. (7) Subsections (3), (4)(b) and (6)(b) do not apply to directions to the extent that they consist of guidance about any of the following— (a) the application or interpretation of the law; (b) the making of decisions by members of the Appeal Tribunal. (8) Subsections (3), (4)(b) and (6)(b) do not apply to directions to the extent that they consist of criteria for determining which members of the Appeal Tribunal may be chosen to decide particular categories of matter; but the directions may, to that extent, be given only after consulting the Lord Chancellor. (9) Subsections (4) and (6) do not apply to directions given in a particular case for the purposes of that case only. (10) Subsection (6) does not apply to directions under section 28(1).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.