National Security and Investment Act 2021
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
1 Call-in notice for national security purposes
(1) The Secretary of State may give a notice if the Secretary of State reasonably suspects that— (a) a trigger event has taken place in relation to a qualifying entity or qualifying asset, and the event has given rise to or may give rise to a risk to national security, or (b) arrangements are in progress or contemplation which, if carried into effect, will result in a trigger event taking place in relation to a qualifying entity or qualifying asset, and the event may give rise to a risk to national security. (2) For the purposes of this Act, in considering whether a trigger event has taken place, or whether arrangements are in progress or contemplation which, if carried into effect, will result in a trigger event taking place, the effect of section 13(1) (notifiable acquisitions that are void) must be disregarded. (3) A notice under subsection (1) is referred to in this Act as a call-in notice. (4) If the Secretary of State decides to give a call-in notice, the notice must be given to— (a) the acquirer, (b) if the trigger event relates to a qualifying entity, the entity, and (c) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (5) The call-in notice must include a description of the trigger event to which it relates and state the names of the persons to whom the notice is given. (6) The Secretary of State may not give a call-in notice unless a statement has been published (and not withdrawn) for the purposes of section 3. (7) The Secretary of State must have regard to that statement before giving a call-in notice. (8) But nothing in the statement limits the power to give a call-in notice.
1 Call-in notice for national security purposes
(1) The Secretary of State may give a notice if the Secretary of State reasonably suspects that— (a) a trigger event has taken place in relation to a qualifying entity or qualifying asset, and the event has given rise to or may give rise to a risk to national security, or (b) arrangements are in progress or contemplation which, if carried into effect, will result in a trigger event taking place in relation to a qualifying entity or qualifying asset, and the event may give rise to a risk to national security. (2) For the purposes of this Act, in considering whether a trigger event has taken place, or whether arrangements are in progress or contemplation which, if carried into effect, will result in a trigger event taking place, the effect of section 13(1) (notifiable acquisitions that are void) must be disregarded. (3) A notice under subsection (1) is referred to in this Act as a call-in notice. (4) If the Secretary of State decides to give a call-in notice, the notice must be given to— (a) the acquirer, (b) if the trigger event relates to a qualifying entity, the entity, and (c) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (5) The call-in notice must include a description of the trigger event to which it relates and state the names of the persons to whom the notice is given. (6) The Secretary of State may not give a call-in notice unless a statement has been published (and not withdrawn) for the purposes of section 3. (7) The Secretary of State must have regard to that statement before giving a call-in notice. (8) But nothing in the statement limits the power to give a call-in notice.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.