Carriage by Air (Supplementary Provisions) Act 1962
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Interpretation of Supplementary Convention.
(1) In the Schedule to this Act “the Warsaw Convention” means— (a) before the day on which section one of the Carriage by Air Act 1961, comes into force, the Convention set out in the First Schedule to the Carriage by Air Act 1932, and (b) on and after that day, whichever is applicable to the carriage in question of the Conventions set out in Schedules 1 and 1A to the said Act of 1961, ... (2) In Articles VII and VIII in the Schedule to this Act “court” includes (in an arbitration allowed by the Conventions referred to in the foregoing subsection or by Article IX, 3 in the Schedule to this Act) an arbitrator. (3) In the application to Scotland of the Schedule to this Act and of the foregoing provisions of this section, for references to an arbitrator and a plaintiff there shall be substituted respectively references to an arbiter and a pursuer.
2 Interpretation of Supplementary Convention.
(1) In the Schedule to this Act “the Warsaw Convention” means— (a) before the day on which section one of the Carriage by Air Act 1961, comes into force, the Convention set out in the First Schedule to the Carriage by Air Act 1932, and (b) on and after that day, whichever is applicable to the carriage in question of the Conventions set out in Schedules 1 and 1A to the said Act of 1961, ... (2) In Articles VII and VIII in the Schedule to this Act “court” includes (in an arbitration allowed by the Conventions referred to in the foregoing subsection or by Article IX, 3 in the Schedule to this Act) an arbitrator. (3) In the application to Scotland of the Schedule to this Act and of the foregoing provisions of this section, for references to an arbitrator and a plaintiff there shall be substituted respectively references to an arbiter and a pursuer.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.