Propose a change

Deer (Amendment) (Scotland) Act 1996 (repealed 19.11.1996)

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

SCHEDULE 2 Repeals

Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 1959 c. 40 | The Deer (Scotland) Act 1959 | Section 1(4) and(5). In section 2, subsections (3) and (4). In section 5(1), the words “red deer or sika”. Section 6A. In section 8, in subsection (3), the words “red deer or sika”. In section 11, subsection (4). In section 12(1), the words “red deer or sika”. In section 14, the words “red deer or sika” and the words “the provisions of this Part of”. In section 15(1)(d), the words “red deer or sika” and the word “general”. In section 19, the words “red deer or sika”. Section 20. In section 22, the proviso to subsection (1). In section 23(5), the word “alive”. Section 25E. In section 27, in subsection (1), the words “firearm or ammunition, vehicle or boat”. In section 31, subsection (2). Section 32. In section 33, subsections (3B) to (5). In Schedule 1, in each of paragraphs 2B and 2C, the words “, with the approval of the Treasury,”. 1967 c. 13 | The Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967 | In Schedule 2, the entry relating to “Red Deer Commission”. 1973 c.54. | The Nature Conservancy Council Act 1973. | In Schedule 1, paragraph 4. 1975 c. 24 | The House of Commons Disqualification Act 1975 | In Schedule 1, in Part III, the entry relating to “Chairman of the Red Deer Commission”. 1982 c.19. | The Deer (Amendment) (Scotland) Act 1982. | Section 1(1) and (4). Section 3(a). Section 4. Section 6(a). Section 7. 1990 c.43. | The Environment Protection Act 1990. | In Schedule 9, paragraph 2. 1991 c.28. | The Natural Heritage (Scotland) Act 1991. | In Schedule 2, paragraph 2.

Your change, as a redline

SCHEDULE 2 Repeals

Chapter | Short title | Extent of repeal 1959 c. 40 | The Deer (Scotland) Act 1959 | Section 1(4) and(5). In section 2, subsections (3) and (4). In section 5(1), the words “red deer or sika”. Section 6A. In section 8, in subsection (3), the words “red deer or sika”. In section 11, subsection (4). In section 12(1), the words “red deer or sika”. In section 14, the words “red deer or sika” and the words “the provisions of this Part of”. In section 15(1)(d), the words “red deer or sika” and the word “general”. In section 19, the words “red deer or sika”. Section 20. In section 22, the proviso to subsection (1). In section 23(5), the word “alive”. Section 25E. In section 27, in subsection (1), the words “firearm or ammunition, vehicle or boat”. In section 31, subsection (2). Section 32. In section 33, subsections (3B) to (5). In Schedule 1, in each of paragraphs 2B and 2C, the words “, with the approval of the Treasury,”. 1967 c. 13 | The Parliamentary Commissioner Act 1967 | In Schedule 2, the entry relating to “Red Deer Commission”. 1973 c.54. | The Nature Conservancy Council Act 1973. | In Schedule 1, paragraph 4. 1975 c. 24 | The House of Commons Disqualification Act 1975 | In Schedule 1, in Part III, the entry relating to “Chairman of the Red Deer Commission”. 1982 c.19. | The Deer (Amendment) (Scotland) Act 1982. | Section 1(1) and (4). Section 3(a). Section 4. Section 6(a). Section 7. 1990 c.43. | The Environment Protection Act 1990. | In Schedule 9, paragraph 2. 1991 c.28. | The Natural Heritage (Scotland) Act 1991. | In Schedule 2, paragraph 2.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds