Propose a change

Finance Act 1994

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

59F Nature of review etc

(1) This section applies if HMRC are required to undertake a review under section 59C or 59E. (2) The nature and extent of the review are to be such as appear appropriate to HMRC in the circumstances. (3) For the purpose of subsection (2), HMRC must, in particular, have regard to steps taken before the beginning of the review— (a) by HMRC in reaching the decision, and (b) by any person in seeking to resolve disagreement about the decision. (4) The review must take account of any representations made by P, or the other person, at a stage which gives HMRC a reasonable opportunity to consider them. (5) The review may conclude that the decision is to be— (a) upheld, (b) varied, or (c) cancelled. (6) HMRC must give P, or the other person, notice of the conclusions of the review and their reasoning within— (a) a period of 45 days beginning with the relevant date, or (b) such other period as HMRC and P, or the other person, may agree. (7) In subsection (6) “relevant date” means— (a) the date HMRC received P’s notification accepting the offer of a review (in a case falling within section 59A), or (b) the date HMRC received notification from another person requiring review (in a case falling within section 59B), or (c) the date on which HMRC decided to undertake the review (in a case falling within section 59E). (8) Where HMRC are required to undertake a review but do not give notice of the conclusions within the time period specified in subsection (6), the review is to be treated as having concluded that the decision is upheld. (9) If subsection (8) applies, HMRC must notify P or the other person of the conclusion which the review is treated as having reached.

Your change, as a redline

59F Nature of review etc

(1) This section applies if HMRC are required to undertake a review under section 59C or 59E. (2) The nature and extent of the review are to be such as appear appropriate to HMRC in the circumstances. (3) For the purpose of subsection (2), HMRC must, in particular, have regard to steps taken before the beginning of the review— (a) by HMRC in reaching the decision, and (b) by any person in seeking to resolve disagreement about the decision. (4) The review must take account of any representations made by P, or the other person, at a stage which gives HMRC a reasonable opportunity to consider them. (5) The review may conclude that the decision is to be— (a) upheld, (b) varied, or (c) cancelled. (6) HMRC must give P, or the other person, notice of the conclusions of the review and their reasoning within— (a) a period of 45 days beginning with the relevant date, or (b) such other period as HMRC and P, or the other person, may agree. (7) In subsection (6) “relevant date” means— (a) the date HMRC received P’s notification accepting the offer of a review (in a case falling within section 59A), or (b) the date HMRC received notification from another person requiring review (in a case falling within section 59B), or (c) the date on which HMRC decided to undertake the review (in a case falling within section 59E). (8) Where HMRC are required to undertake a review but do not give notice of the conclusions within the time period specified in subsection (6), the review is to be treated as having concluded that the decision is upheld. (9) If subsection (8) applies, HMRC must notify P or the other person of the conclusion which the review is treated as having reached.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds