The Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions (Arrangements, Reconstructions and Administration) (Amendment) Order 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
7 Schedule 4 (modified application of insolvency rules in relation to relevant societies)
In Schedule 4— (a) in paragraph 2(a) for “the 1965 Act” substitute “the 2014 Act”; (b) in paragraph 9(a)— (i) for “issued an acknowledgement under section 1(3) of the 1967 Act” substitute “gave an acknowledgement under section 59(4) of the 2014 Act”; (ii) for “section 1(2)” substitute “section 59(3)”; (c) in paragraph 19(b), in the sub-paragraph substituted for sub-paragraph (a) of Rule 2.49(5A) of the Insolvency Rules 1986 for “section 74(1) of the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965” substitute “article 1(2) of the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions (Arrangements, Reconstructions and Administration) Order 2014”; (d) in paragraph 41(a) for “issued under section 4(3) of the 1967 Act” substitute “given under section 63(4) of the 2014 Act”; and (e) in paragraph 51— (i) in sub-paragraph (b), in the provisions substituted for paragraph (2) of Rule 2.41 of the Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986 (“the Rules”) in paragraph (2A)(b) for “section 255 of the Enterprise Act 2002” substitute “section 118 of the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies Act 2014”; (ii) in sub-paragraph (d), in paragraph (6) added to Rule 2.41 of the Rules, in the definition of “relevant society” for “section 74(1) of the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965” substitute “article 1(2) of the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions (Arrangements, Reconstructions and Administration) Order 2014”.
7 Schedule 4 (modified application of insolvency rules in relation to relevant societies)
In Schedule 4— (a) in paragraph 2(a) for “the 1965 Act” substitute “the 2014 Act”; (b) in paragraph 9(a)— (i) for “issued an acknowledgement under section 1(3) of the 1967 Act” substitute “gave an acknowledgement under section 59(4) of the 2014 Act”; (ii) for “section 1(2)” substitute “section 59(3)”; (c) in paragraph 19(b), in the sub-paragraph substituted for sub-paragraph (a) of Rule 2.49(5A) of the Insolvency Rules 1986 for “section 74(1) of the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965” substitute “article 1(2) of the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions (Arrangements, Reconstructions and Administration) Order 2014”; (d) in paragraph 41(a) for “issued under section 4(3) of the 1967 Act” substitute “given under section 63(4) of the 2014 Act”; and (e) in paragraph 51— (i) in sub-paragraph (b), in the provisions substituted for paragraph (2) of Rule 2.41 of the Insolvency (Scotland) Rules 1986 (“the Rules”) in paragraph (2A)(b) for “section 255 of the Enterprise Act 2002” substitute “section 118 of the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies Act 2014”; (ii) in sub-paragraph (d), in paragraph (6) added to Rule 2.41 of the Rules, in the definition of “relevant society” for “section 74(1) of the Industrial and Provident Societies Act 1965” substitute “article 1(2) of the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies and Credit Unions (Arrangements, Reconstructions and Administration) Order 2014”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.