The Infected Blood Compensation Scheme (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
5 Amendments relating to the autonomy (core) award
(1) Regulation 18 (autonomy (core) award) is amended as follows. (2) In paragraph (1), after sub-paragraph (c) insert— (d) impact on a person relating to having been infected during childhood. . (3) After paragraph (1) insert— (1A) Subject to paragraphs (4) and (5), the amount of the autonomy (core) award is— (a) where P was infected as a child, A + B, where— (i) “A” is the basic autonomy amount, and (ii) “B” is the childhood infection amount; (b) where P was not infected as a child, the basic autonomy amount. . (4) In paragraph (2), for “Subject to paragraphs (4) and (5), the amount of the autonomy (core) award” substitute “The basic autonomy amount”. (5) For paragraph (3) substitute— (3) Where P has a co-infection, the basic autonomy amount is £70,000. . (6) After paragraph (3) insert— (3A) The childhood infection amount is, where on the day before the day on which P turned 18 P had a single infection of— (a) Hepatitis C of severity level 1, £5,000; (b) Hepatitis B or C, and the severity level of the infection was— (i) level 2, 2B or level 3, £20,000; (ii) level 4, £25,000; (c) Hepatitis B of severity level 5, £25,000; (d) HIV, £30,000. (3B) The childhood infection amount is, where on the day before the day on which P turned 18 P had a co-infection, £35,000. . (7) In paragraph (4)(a) for “paragraph (2) or (3)” substitute “paragraph (1A) to (3A)”. (8) After paragraph (5) insert— (6) In this regulation, “child” means a person aged 17 or under. .
5 Amendments relating to the autonomy (core) award
(1) Regulation 18 (autonomy (core) award) is amended as follows. (2) In paragraph (1), after sub-paragraph (c) insert— (d) impact on a person relating to having been infected during childhood. . (3) After paragraph (1) insert— (1A) Subject to paragraphs (4) and (5), the amount of the autonomy (core) award is— (a) where P was infected as a child, A + B, where— (i) “A” is the basic autonomy amount, and (ii) “B” is the childhood infection amount; (b) where P was not infected as a child, the basic autonomy amount. . (4) In paragraph (2), for “Subject to paragraphs (4) and (5), the amount of the autonomy (core) award” substitute “The basic autonomy amount”. (5) For paragraph (3) substitute— (3) Where P has a co-infection, the basic autonomy amount is £70,000. . (6) After paragraph (3) insert— (3A) The childhood infection amount is, where on the day before the day on which P turned 18 P had a single infection of— (a) Hepatitis C of severity level 1, £5,000; (b) Hepatitis B or C, and the severity level of the infection was— (i) level 2, 2B or level 3, £20,000; (ii) level 4, £25,000; (c) Hepatitis B of severity level 5, £25,000; (d) HIV, £30,000. (3B) The childhood infection amount is, where on the day before the day on which P turned 18 P had a co-infection, £35,000. . (7) In paragraph (4)(a) for “paragraph (2) or (3)” substitute “paragraph (1A) to (3A)”. (8) After paragraph (5) insert— (6) In this regulation, “child” means a person aged 17 or under. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.