The Infected Blood Compensation Scheme (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6 Amendments relating to unethical research practices
(1) In regulation 26 (meaning of “unethical research practices”)— (a) omit paragraphs (2) and (3); (b) at the end, insert— (4) An eligible infected person was also subject to unethical research practices if— (a) they received, in the course of NHS treatment or armed forces treatment overseas, treatment for a bleeding disorder before 1986, and (b) they were not subject to unethical research practices in accordance with paragraph (1). (5) In paragraph (4), “armed forces treatment overseas” and “NHS treatment” have the meanings given in regulation 3(10). . (2) In regulation 27 (amount of unethical research practices award)— (a) in paragraph (1), for “£15,000” substitute “£60,000”; (b) omit paragraph (2); (c) after paragraph (1), insert— (3) Where the eligible infected person (“P”) was subject to unethical research practices in accordance with regulation 26(4), the amount of an unethical research practices award in relation to that person is— (a) where P was subject to unethical research practices while aged 17 or under, £45,000; (b) where P was not subject to unethical research practices while aged 17 or under, £30,000. .
6 Amendments relating to unethical research practices
(1) In regulation 26 (meaning of “unethical research practices”)— (a) omit paragraphs (2) and (3); (b) at the end, insert— (4) An eligible infected person was also subject to unethical research practices if— (a) they received, in the course of NHS treatment or armed forces treatment overseas, treatment for a bleeding disorder before 1986, and (b) they were not subject to unethical research practices in accordance with paragraph (1). (5) In paragraph (4), “armed forces treatment overseas” and “NHS treatment” have the meanings given in regulation 3(10). . (2) In regulation 27 (amount of unethical research practices award)— (a) in paragraph (1), for “£15,000” substitute “£60,000”; (b) omit paragraph (2); (c) after paragraph (1), insert— (3) Where the eligible infected person (“P”) was subject to unethical research practices in accordance with regulation 26(4), the amount of an unethical research practices award in relation to that person is— (a) where P was subject to unethical research practices while aged 17 or under, £45,000; (b) where P was not subject to unethical research practices while aged 17 or under, £30,000. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.