The Infected Blood Compensation Scheme (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Schedule Consequential amendments relating to the “past amount” and “future amount” of certain awards
Regulation 4(4) 1 (1) In regulation 2 (interpretation), in paragraph (2)— (a) in sub-paragraph (x) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) or (1B)(b)”; (b) in sub-paragraph (y) for “regulation 7(2)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(a) or (1B)(a)”. (2) In regulation 15 (amount of an infected core payment), in paragraph (2)(e)(i) for “regulation 7(2)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(a) and (1B)(a)”. (3) In regulation 22 (support scheme top-up (core) award), in paragraph (2)(a)(i) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”. (4) In regulation 24 (amount of an infected supplemental payment), in paragraph (5)(a)(i) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”. (5) In regulation 43 (amount of a further infected core payment)— (a) in paragraph (1)(a)(v)(aa) for “regulation 7(2)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(a) and (1B)(a)”; (b) in paragraph (7)(a)(i) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”. (6) In regulation 46 (amount of a further infected supplemental payment), in paragraph (5)(a)(i) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”. (7) In regulation 79 (Payment of future financial loss and care awards where an SSP recipient dies), in paragraph (1A)(a) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”. (8) In regulation 79A (payment of future financial loss and care awards where an eligible SSP recipient opts out of support scheme payments), in paragraph (2)(a)(i) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”.
Schedule Consequential amendments relating to the “past amount” and “future amount” of certain awards
Regulation 4(4) 1 (1) In regulation 2 (interpretation), in paragraph (2)— (a) in sub-paragraph (x) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) or (1B)(b)”; (b) in sub-paragraph (y) for “regulation 7(2)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(a) or (1B)(a)”. (2) In regulation 15 (amount of an infected core payment), in paragraph (2)(e)(i) for “regulation 7(2)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(a) and (1B)(a)”. (3) In regulation 22 (support scheme top-up (core) award), in paragraph (2)(a)(i) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”. (4) In regulation 24 (amount of an infected supplemental payment), in paragraph (5)(a)(i) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”. (5) In regulation 43 (amount of a further infected core payment)— (a) in paragraph (1)(a)(v)(aa) for “regulation 7(2)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(a) and (1B)(a)”; (b) in paragraph (7)(a)(i) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”. (6) In regulation 46 (amount of a further infected supplemental payment), in paragraph (5)(a)(i) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”. (7) In regulation 79 (Payment of future financial loss and care awards where an SSP recipient dies), in paragraph (1A)(a) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”. (8) In regulation 79A (payment of future financial loss and care awards where an eligible SSP recipient opts out of support scheme payments), in paragraph (2)(a)(i) for “regulation 7(3)” substitute “regulation 7(1A)(b) and (1B)(b)”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.